Wordtrade LogoWordtrade.com
Themes

 

Review Essays of Academic, Professional & Technical Books in the Humanities & Sciences

 

Wordtrade.com/themes                         06/26/09

 

 
 

             Political Economy, Intellectual Property Rights, Urban Renewal, Archeology, Finance, Science, Marketing, Computer Security, Ecology, Development, Ethics, Mathematics, Theory, Textbooks, Titles in Brief, More Economics

Mindful Conservatism: Rethinking the Ideological and Educational Basis of an Ecologically Sustainable Future by C. A. Bowers (Rowman & Littlefield) (Hardcover) Bowers uses the phrase mindful conservatism as encompassing the two key principles of philosophic conservatism, as well as the relational, ecologically sensitive thinking needed to reduce our impact on natural systems. The emphasis on mindfulness helps to highlight the role that critical reflection needs to play in assessing which aspects of our cultural practices contribute to long-term sustainability. Critical reflection is also essential to clarifying relationships within the human community and between human and natural communities. In using the phrase mindful conservatism, Bowers fur­ther understands that the ways of knowing and patterns of moral rec­iprocity will vary between cultures. Because the life-forming and life-sustaining processes within different communities are never static, it is necessary to avoid reducing mindful conservatism to a rigid set of prescriptions. Rather, it requires continual awareness of changes occurring in the environment as a reflective approach to the question: What do we want to conserve? It also requires a knowledge of the nonmonetized activities and relationships that are the basis of com­munity self-sufficiency. Finally, it requires a knowledge of the eco­nomic, political, and technoscientific forces that subvert reflection and thus subvert democratic decision making about the impact of innovations on the well-being of the human and biotic community. In effect, the challenge of rectifying our language is as ongoing as is the process of reconciling change with traditions that strengthen the com­munity and the prospects of future generations.

This culturally and experientially grounded way of understanding mindful conservatism, as well as the rapid changes in the sustaining capacity of the Earth's ecosystems, forces us to ask, What is it that the groups who now call themselves "conservatives" want to conserve? To put the question another way: Are environmentalists and groups working to renew community the genuine "conservatives"? And if so, what is a more accurate way of understanding the ideological orientation of corporations, moneyed elites, technoscientists, and groups who view themselves as anti-environmentalists? In order to shed light on the implications that surround the current misuse of our political lan­guage, the following chapters attempt to answer these questions.

Chapter 1 contrasts the earlier Republican support of environmental legislation with the anti-environmental stance of post-Nixon Republi­cans. The chapter also examines the ideological underpinnings of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA, which the Clinton administration supported), as well as the impact of these international agreements on the well-being of communities and on cultural diversity. The purpose of highlighting the connections between the anti-environmental policies of the post-Nixon Republicans and the international trade agreements is to bring out that their ideological roots are not in philosophical conservatism, but in the classical liberal tradition that goes back to John Locke, Adam smith, John Stuart Mill, and Herbert Spencer. In effect, the promoters of globalization and other anti-environmental policies are carrying forward the nineteenth-century political agenda that masks colonization as the process of modernization and the degradation of the environment as technological development. It is important to be aware that the focus here is on how the term conservative is misused in the media and in the public discourse. Thus, the primary focus of this chapter is on the current misuse of political categories at the highest levels of government and not on the debates between academics. The current state of conceptual and moral confusion, now being exacerbated by presidents and reporters, has helped solidify in the public mind the idea that to be a conservative means being against environmentalists and being in favor of NAFTA and the WTO. Perhaps this more limited focus will help to rectify the public's understanding of which groups and policies should be held accountable for degrading the environment and for un­dermining the self-sufficiency of local communities and other cultures.

Chapter 2 examines the ideas and values that motivate anti-environmental groups, such as Wise Use and the organizers of the anti-Earth Day rally recently held in Montana. Anti-environmental authors are also considered. Bowers examines the ideas of William F. Buckley Jr., as well as the contributors to the National Review, in terms of whether their self-proclaimed conservatism has its ideological roots in the ideas of Burke or the classical liberal thinkers. The anti-environmentalism of Rush Limbaugh and contributors to such sup­posedly conservative think tanks as the Heritage Foundation and the CATO Institute are also be considered. These men and institutions are icons that a large segment of the general public associate with conservatism. Indeed, they have mentored many Americans on how to recognize what a conservative stands for. Unfortunately, many critics of so-called conservative values and policies have also allowed themselves to be part of this mentoring process, which has led them to identify with the core liberal values and thus to turn a blind eye to the historical connections between these values and the spread of an industrial-based lifestyle. The success of Buckley, Limbaugh, and the free market-oriented think tanks has become a major factor in making more difficult the task of rectifying the public's use of political language, and thus the ability to rectify our relationships with each other and with the environment.

Chapter 3 involves an examination of the key assumptions of classical liberal thinking that underlies modem technology and science. These assumptions include the efficacy of competition and the "invisi­ble hand" that ensures that the best and strongest prevail, the over-coming of the constraints of tradition on technoscientific progress, the individual rather than the cultural nature of intelligence, and the mech­anistic and anthropocentric way of thinking. Bowers considers the histor­ical connections among modem science, technology, and the Industrial Revolution, as well as the current merging of science with corporate values. What is also given special attention is the thinking of E. O. Wilson that is so widely shared within the scientific community—that the implications of his efforts to turn the theory of evolution into an ideol­ogy justifies a world monoculture. This chapter brings out the paradox of modem science and technology that is seldom acknowledged. Like the Roman god Janus, which has two faces looking in opposite direc­tions, modem science and technology have made important contribu­tions in the areas of human understanding and technological innovation, but at the same time they have marginalized intergenerational knowledge of communities and undermined the cultural/linguistic diversity that is a repository of knowledge of biodiversity.

Chapter 4 is the first of three chapters making the argument that en­vironmentalists are the genuine conservatives—in the twin sense of attempting to preserve the long-term well-being of communities and natural systems. In it, Bowers addresses the environmentally and community-destructive impact of globalization by focusing on three arguments. First, the conserving nature of cultural languages is now being threatened by modern technology and policies promoting glob­alization. He gives special attention to how languages are the basis of sharing intergenerational knowledge of plants, animals, and other characteristics of the bioregion; in addition, Bowers concentrates on how the loss of linguistic diversity contributes to undermining biodiversity. Second, examples of cultures that are more ecologically centered and thus self-reliant. Third, we can learn from these traditional, ecologi­cally centered cultures, and we can also accept that learning is differ­ent from borrowing. The chapter also addresses the difference be­tween reactionary traditions that are the source of continued social injustices within a culture, and traditions that contribute to patterns of moral reciprocity, self-sufficiency, and ecological responsibility.

Chapter 5 focuses on issues related to conserving community, cul­tural, and biodiversity in North America. It involves examining the ideas and practices of cultural groups that are not centered on a con­sumer-dependent lifestyle or a technology-dependent lifestyle. These ideas include religiously based communities, as well as communitarian-oriented individuals who are practicing voluntary simplicity. The purpose of the chapter is to highlight the diverse range of efforts to create more self-supporting and interdependent communities, more technolo­gies that incorporate the principles of ecological design, and more agricultural practices that are ecologically sustainable. Providing an exhaustive account of the groups and activities that have a conserving effect on communities and the environment will not be the main objec­tive of the chapter. Rather, it is to bring the reader back to the basic issue, which is that community and environmental activism takes many forms that are essentially conservative in nature. Perhaps an overview of the conserving nature of daily cultural practices, as well as how it is a basic aspect of biological regeneration, will help overcome the stereo-typed thinking expressed in such statements as "Conservatism sees inequality as natural and desirable" and "Law and order are the princi­pal concerns of conservatives." The problem that stereotyped thinking about conservatism cannot address is why such environmentalists as Wendell Berry, Aldo Leopold, Vandana Shiva, and Wes Jackson should be regarded as conservative thinkers.

Chapter 6 examines the connections between so-called conservative and progressive educational reforms, classical liberal assumptions, and the forces now promoting globalization. Attention will also be given to curricular reforms' contributing to the traditions of different communities that reduce dependence on consumerism and other en­vironmentally destructive practices. It will be argued that these reforms should reorient students so that the taken-for-granted concern is not with keeping up with the latest changes introduced by experts and promoters of new technologies, but with conserving skills, rela­tionships, and activities that strengthen their commitment to commu­nity and a sustainable future. A curriculum that provides students with a more complex understanding of how to conserve community and the environment will help overcome current misconceptions that do not take account of how intergenerational knowledge is both re­newed and modified by each generation. It will also help students hold social groups who label themselves as "conservatives" accountable for what their policies and practices actually conserve.

How on earth can you call a book about sustainability 'Mindful Conservatism', you might ask. Please don't let your preconceptions and the current usage of the term 'conservatism' make you turn away from this important and timely book.
C. A. Bowers opens up one of the most crucial debates that we should lead if we are serious about an ecologically sustainable future. We generally shy away from this discussion because of its potential pitfalls, misunderstandings and a tradition of abuse of the term 'conservatism'.
I believe that Bowers' book is hugely important because it emphasises throughout the concept of mindfulness, as opposed to preconceived convictions. It challenges us 'to rethink our traditional political categories' and to question what the media and politicians want to make us believe. We have to learn to step out of the box because the traditional political vocabulary simply is not fit to cope with the sustainability challenge.
The central question of the book is 'What do we need to conserve in order to have a more sustainable future and just world order?' This clearly calls for a complex answer and is also arguably the most important question to be asked if we want to turn our destructive, exploitative, overdeveloped and overconsuming global world order into something which can sustain itself within the limits of the ecosphere. 

The Sociology of the Economy edited by Frank Dobbin (Russell Sage Foundation Publications) The great promise of economic sociology is that it can explain aspects of economic behavior and institutions that have been resistant to explanation. The chapters assembled in this volume represent the best empirical work being done in economic sociology today, and the payoff is a series of empirically verified insights about how economic behavior patterns come about—a sociology of the economy. The social mechanisms underlying economic behavior that these twelve studies document do not boil down to a single principle, such as the principle of self-interest in neoclassical economics. But neither do these chapters present a disorganized hodgepodge of ideas. They demonstrate four social processes at work:

  1. The structure of political institutions determines who will shape economic institutions and conventions and what those institutions and conventions will look like.

  2. Firms and nations follow the rational strategies of their role models, just as adolescents follow the behavior of their role models, and hence much economic behavior looks more like crowd behavior than like the result of pure rational calculation.

  3. Social networks shape economic practices in a wide range of ways—by providing sanctions for malfeasance but also by providing cues that shape prices, by providing business strategies that industries can copy, and by shaping the competitive environment.

  4. Ideas influence economic behavior and institutions, and ideas embedded in economic customs often shape new economic customs. For instance, the idea of market competition as efficient arbiter is well institutionalized in the industrial sector in the United States, and that idea has come to shape other sectors, such as health care. In the modem world there is a wide range of rational ideas—visions of how to rationalize things—and understanding their origins and influence promises to help us to under-stand why economic institutions and behaviors vary so significantly. 

Economic sociology is built on the premise that narrow economic laws do not drive economic practices to become identical across societies. There may be many efficient ways to organize a transplant organ market, a market for corporate control, and the health care sector, as suggested by Healy; Schneper and Guillén; and Scott, respectively. Economic sociology has been reinvigorated since the 1980s in large part because nations that did not fit the model that Britain and later the United States seemed to epitomize grew at astonishing rates in the postwar period—chiefly the East Asian economies, but France, Germany, and Sweden as well. If there is more than one truly efficient solution to any economic problem, then the explanations of economic behavior that social scientists have been working with are too limiting. Most are based on the assumption that history is efficient, which suggests that economic practices evolve toward increasingly efficient forms. This kind of efficiency is certainly what nations oriented to growth strive for, and that striving has gone a long way toward increasing efficiency in the aggregate. But explanations of economic behavior have also been based on an assumption of optimality, which suggests that economic practices evolve toward a single efficient form. If economic practices are not evolving toward a single efficient form, it would appear that the ideal of the "perfect market" is not driving the evolution of economic practices and that we need to develop explanations that root economic behavior in society rather than in economic ideas that transcend society.

Taken together, these twelve chapters suggest that markets are social structures first and foremost. They are incompletely described by algorithms

that predict prices and output. As social structures, they are composed of roles, conventions, and institutions, and they are characterized by ongoing disputes over what those roles, conventions, and institutions should look like. These disputes are typically framed as scientific and managerial disagreements over the most efficient means of organizing the world, and this characterization of the disputes—their seeming orientation to divining the true "best way" of organizing an economic sector—reinforces the notion that it is economic laws that drive change in the system. Our determined efforts to divine the character of those economic laws often blind us to the mundane social origins of many economic behavior patterns.

Put another way, even if universal economic laws select superior economic roles, conventions, and institutions for survival and doom inferior ones, it is important to understand where the great variety of roles, conventions, and institutions come from in the first place. And even if economic laws shape the long-run evolution of the economy, it is important to understand what shapes the short-run social perturbations that spawn new market forms and often extinguish them before economic laws have a chance to do their job of rewarding the best and destroying the worst.

The chapters assembled in this volume show that markets have the characteristics of other sorts of social structures, like religions or clans. Like religions and clans, markets can take any number of different forms. Some will not prosper, but history suggests that many different forms of markets can prosper—that different logics of efficiency exist. For economic sociologists, then, the most important questions concern how markets emerge, stabilize, and change. It is these processes that are explored by the chapters of this book. The chapters on political institutions sketch the effects of the political on the initial structuring of markets. The chapters on economic models show how economic conventions travel from one place to another, producing change in markets. The chapters on networks show how social relations modify market behavior, and the final chapters show how ideas can revolutionize markets or make them resistant to change.

If markets are social structures, on a par with other social structures, rather than price functions, we need to know more about their organization and why they change. The studies included in this volume demonstrate the ability of economic sociology to explain the emergence of various types of markets, their persistence, and change. How can we understand, for instance, the stability of the model of American corporate structure over the last one hundred years—the tendency for large firms to dominate even in sectors where there are no economies of scale? Economic theory alone does not explain the early rise of huge firms in the United States, and so Charles Pen-ow traces the initial political institutions that encouraged capitalists to shape the regulations that they had to live by. Here, as in Bai Gao's chapter on the rise of business associations in the Japanese economy, we see that political institutions shaped early policymaking and thereby affected industry structure. In both cases, new policy institutions and corporate practices became cognitively embedded and thus resistant to challenge.

How can we explain the fact that American banks set up foreign branches in droves around 1970 but had stopped by 1980? Conventional economic explanations fail here, and it is clear that two important sociological forces were in play: a tendency to mimic role models and a tendency to learn through social networks. Mizruchi and Davis's study thus provides strong evidence that what goes by the name of "rational calculation" is often based not on evidence but on mimicry of role models, and that face-to-face networks are often the conduits through which new putatively rational prescriptions diffuse.

How can we explain the fact that modern medical care moved from professional domination to managed care? The change fits the commonsense view that the world is being rationalized in the image of neoliberalism, but it in fact represents the shift from one ideological form of rationality, professional expertise, to an interim form, bureaucratic expertise, to a third and fragile form, "managed care." Underlying this story we find competing groups with different rationales who have played different roles at different times. These competing ideas of rationality seemed to give the health care industry coherence and meaning for participants, and each seemed like the ultimate and final ordering of the industry at the time. Ideas do matter, and ideas of rationality have a certain finality about them.

That economic sociology has produced such a wealth of empirical findings in the scant twenty years since its renaissance bodes well for its future. That so many of those findings can be traced directly to a handful of social processes that the first group of economic sociologists, Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Emile Durkheim, saw at work a century or more ago also bodes well, because it suggests that a finite number of social mechanisms typically shape economic behavior and that those mechanisms are relatively stable across con-texts. The structure of political institutions and decision-making processes matters for the form taken by economic institutions and regulations. The human tendency to copy behavior and to copy institutions seems to operate in all social contexts, and it plays a large role in shaping economic behavior (a role that is often attributed to rational calculation). Social systems shape behavior of all sorts, both through networks that diffuse new ideas and through net-works that constrain malfeasance. And ideas influence all kinds of social behavior, including economic behavior, despite the fact that the effects can be difficult to see in a world where the proponents of new economic conventions and institutions appeal to universal economic laws rather than human-made conceptions of rationality. 

Greece's New Political Economy: State, Finance and Growth from Postwar to EMU by George Pagoulatos (Palgrave Macmillan) traces the course of Greece from a postwar developmental state to its current participation in the Euro-zone. Taking an innovative comparative approach, George Pagoulatos examines the political economy of financial interventionism and liberalization, banking politics, relations between the government and central bank, the winners and losers of financial reform, the effects of globalization and EMU, and the implications of the new economic role of the state.

Greece's New Political Economy: State, Finance and Growth from Postwar to EMU analyzes Greece's 50-year-long trajectory by keeping a central focus on the state-finance connection and its development. In an intellectual tradition that can be traced back to Marx, Hilferding, and Polanyi (1944: 250), the market (and by the same token, the exact nature of the state's role in the economy, including the financial regime) is not a `state of nature' phenomenon. It is an institutional configuration resulting from a particular sociopolitical structure comprising power relations both at the domestic and the international level. In that vein, this book looks at: the international political economy regime, from which structural dependencies, obligations, and constraints emanate; the economic ideology and policy paradigm, a source of normative blueprint, policy inspiration, and pivotal peer pressure; the institutional arrangements (regarding the political system, financial and market institutions, the state and the central bank) which facilitate and constrain policy action; the sociopolitical and economic interests operating at the domestic and international level.

Chapter 2 examines the regime dependencies underlying Greek post-war economic and financial policies until 1973-74, dependencies emanating both from an international cold war environment and the Bretton Woods economic order. The applied economic 'model' is analyzed in detail, emphasizing the international ideological and policy influences that defined it. The chapter looks at the domestic sociopolitical factors, their interrelation with economic and financial policies, the applied policy pattern, and the political implications of credit interventionism.

Chapter 3 takes a detailed look at the institutions and policies of post-war developmental finance. The chapter places the Greek case in a comparative policy context and evaluates the influence exerted by foreign financial and industrial policy models. The developmental character of the Greek postwar state and financial interventionism is assessed, with afocus on the role of banking institutions and the implications for industrial development.

Chapter 4 deals with the international economic crisis of the 1970s, and its effects on Greek economic and financial policies. These are examined in the context of the post-1974 sociopolitical democratization, which had a crucial impact on economic policies and the way in which financial interventionism was employed. The chapter explores the institutional, economic, and ideological transformations in the international and European environment over the 1970s and 1980s, and their significance regarding the international allocation of power. These factors are regarded as an external context from which pressures for domestic policy adjustment emanate. Greek economic and financial policies, and the decline of developmental credit interventionism, are considered in conjunction with their sociopolitical implications.

Chapters 5 and 6 analyze the politics, policies, policymaking, and political economy of Greek domestic financial liberalization in the second half of the 1980s and into the 1990s. The institutional attributes and the central role of the Bank of Greece in the policymaking process are examined and assessed, focusing on the question of central bank independence. An analytical framework of central bank 'policy strength' is adopted for analyzing the central bank's relations with government, the banking sector, and socioeconomic interests affected by credit deregulation. Economic and monetary adjustment and Europeanization from the second half of the 1980s and through the 1990s are discussed. The stakes, the winners and losers of financial liberalization are examined in detail, with special emphasis on the banking sector. Finally, a broader analysis of interest organizational patterns and state-society relations throughout the postauthoritarian period concludes Chapter 6.

Chapter 7 is devoted to the new political economy of financial liberalization and globalization, including the economic and financial implications of EMU. The chapter discusses the implications of increased capital mobility and financial deepening on the international allocation of power, on the national economy and financial system, on the business-labor balance, on political party ideology and policies, and on the political preferences of the public.

Chapter 8 reflects on the state-finance connection, arguing that the (loosely defined) developmental state has been transformed into a stabilization state. The chapter summarizes and elaborates on the main theoretical and empirical findings of the book, and extends them to some broader conclusions.

Greece's postwar boom was not a case of Keynesian prosperity but the take-off of a developing country. Greece's equivalent of les trentes glorieuses was a time of deferred welfare though steadily decreasing poverty, and sociopolitical deprivation, both of which leave no grounds for postwar era nostalgia. Then Greece's own belated experience with Keynesianism in the 1970s and 1980s was flawed and far from having been crowned with success. In fact, it may have offered a potent argument for the wisdom of surrendering some economic policy control to external technocracy agents less susceptible to the vagaries of electoral politics. (It may also, even more wisely, have suggested an institutional reform path of rendering electoral politics less debilitating in their economic impact.) With the hindsight of the relatively successful economic adjustment of the 1990s, a major lesson to be drawn is that in the era of increasing globalization and interdependence unilateral divergence comes at a heavy financial price. Independent policy efforts to contravene the dictates of global-capital-imposed economic orthodoxy by substantially raising social spending and tightening social regulation are highly likely to meet with rising inflation, faltering economic growth, and higher unemployment down the road.

However, this admission of 'gloomy' pragmatism should far from imply an uncritical in toto acceptance of the 'sound finance' orthodoxy. Quixotic expansionary attempts doomed to fail as they seek to defy the overwhelming power of global financial markets are the best match for the Panglossian belief in the superior self-regulating efficiency of unfettered financial liberalization. Certain items of the orthodox agenda retain their robustness as policy prescriptions. These include the merits of open trade, the overhaul of insurance and pension systems, the need to ground social redistribution on sound public finance, the divestiture of at least some state-owned business firms (followed by bold reregulation), the rationalization and marketization of a certain range of state-controlled activities, followed by a clear delineation of the public—private boundary. Other items of the currently orthodox agenda, however, have been laid bare to compelling dispute. While the dismantling of barriers for cross-border investment capital has spread growth opportunities, the total deregulation of restrictions on the movement of purely speculative short-term capital has left many economies under the Damoclean sword of a financial collapse, transferring unprecedented power to the hands of collectively irrational global financial market players. Inasmuch as unilateral national opt-outs from this global financial disorder are hardly viable, the degree of absurdity of this particular dimension of financial globalization has rightfully intensified calls for global-level universally coordinated action oriented toward 'governing' and taxing short-term capital movements. Regaining democratic control over economic policy inevitably passes through multilateral and supranational cooperation, aimed at establishing a substantial degree of global control over short-term capital movements, that is enforcing a global governance over financial globalization.

All that said, today's antiglobalization backlash, comprising as it does anything from rationalist proponents of global-level institutional reform to zealots of antimarket Ludditism, parochial anti-Americanism, and cultural nationalism risks throwing away the baby with the bath-water. A dangerous paradox has been noted, among others, underlying the reaction to globalization: that is a tendency of blaming social dislocations caused by what is today a largely self-regulating international market on excessive international regulatory intervention and encroachment in national policy sovereignty. This 'democracy illusion' fails to comprehend the exact nature of supranational interdependencies, seeking instead refuge in an affirmation of national interest. It thus ends up obstructing precisely those multilateral supranational-level procedures necessary for the emergence of effective regulatory reform and global-level governance.

East Asian Economic Regionalism by Edward J. Lincoln (The Brookings Institution) Something new is happening across East Asia. A region notable for its lack of internal economic links is discussing regional cooperation on trade, investment, and exchange rates. Because of negotiations elsewhere around the globe on regional trade—such as those that led to the consolidation of the European Union, the formation of the North American Free Trade Area, and the rapid proliferation of bilateral free trade areas—the talk is not surprising. Nevertheless, East Asia’s past inertia with regard to forming a regional partnership raises many questions about its emerging regionalism. Why has the region suddenly shifted from taking a global approach to economic issues to discussing a regional bloc? How fast and how far will the new regionalism progress? Will the region become a version of the European Union, or something far less? What is the probable impact on American economic and strategic interests—are the likely developments something that the U.S. government should encourage or discourage? Edward Lincoln takes up these questions, exploring what is happening to regional trade and investment flows and what sort of regional arrangements are the most sensible.

Lincoln argues that an exclusive grouping is unlikely. Free trade negotiations have brought some economies in the region together, but they also have led to links with nations outside the region. Some regional governments most notably Japan, continue to have difficulty embracing the concept of free trade, even with favored regional partners. In the wake of the Asian financial crisis, governments also have looked at cooperating on exchange rates, but they have done little to move forward.

The U.S. government must decide how to respond to these developments in East Asia. An exclusively Asian form of regionalism could run counter to American economic interests, and the U.S. government has reacted negatively to some of these proposals in the past. Because trade and investment links between the countries of the Asia Pacific region and the United States remain very strong, Lincoln argues that the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation forum remains the appropriate institution for pursuing regional trade and investment issues. 

Political Economy

The Encyclopedia of Public Choice edited by Charles Kershaw Rowley, Friedrich Schneider (Kluwer Academic) offers a detailed and comprehensive account of the subject that deals with the intersection of economics and political science. Its fruitful exchange among ethics, moral and political philosophy, and law, as well as economics and political science, examines the image of man as a purposive and rational actor. Its balanced coverage, which reflects the various public choice methodologies and approaches, is thoughtful, comprehensive, lively, and original. It will be the definitive reference source for decades to come.

Volume I includes biographies of the major figures in public choice, those who set the scene for the disciplines and those who have made major contributions to its development and essays written by leading senior public choice scholars. Their important, and occasionally controversial, themes offer in-depth analysis and reflection beyond the scope of standard works. Volume II defines in detail the core concepts associated with the discipline.

Advisory board:

James M. Buchanan, George Mason University; Bernard Grofman, University of California, Irvine; Arye L. Hillman, Bar-Ilan University; Martin Paldam, Aarhus University; William F. Shughart II, University of Mississippi; Robert D. Tollison, University of Mississippi; Dennis C. Mueller, University of Vienna; Michael C. Munger, Duke University; Peter C. Ordeshook, California Institute of Technology; Gordon Tullock, George Mason University; Hannelore Weck-Hannemann, Universität Innsbruck. 

The Encyclopedia of Public Choice will surely prove to be a major sourcework for students and scholars working in public choice and related areas. Professors Rowley and Schneider are major contributors to the public choice literature, and they have combined their talents and insights in this project to produce a work on public choice that will rank as a classic in the field. The coverage of subject matter is extensive and excellent, the individual contributors are well known scholars in the field, and these men and women have framed their papers not simply as surveys of a particular aspect of public choice theory or practice but as original contributions in their own right. My hat is off to the editors for a job well done.' Robert D. Tollison, Professor of Economics, University of Mississippi The Encyclopedia of Public Choice is a welcome addition to a literature that has grown by leaps and bounds over the past half century. Containing scores of carefully chosen concept entries, longer essays and autobiographies contributed by and about the field's founding fathers as well as several generations of younger scholars who have guided public choice into the intellectual mainstream, the Encyclopedia not only summarizes the major strides already taken by researchers working at the intersection of economics and political science, but breaks new ground in applying public choice reasoning to current events as diverse as corporate accounting scandals, globalization and terrorism. Monumental in conception and written in a lively and accessible style, the Encyclopedia is an authoritative and comprehensive point of entry into a fertile research program that illuminates human behavior in a variety of non-market settings, such as committees, bureaucracies, legislatures and clubs, where collective action necessarily displaces individual action. The Encyclopedia of Public Choice promises to become a reference work of lasting value for students of economics, sociology and political science, academicians, policymakers and observers of the public policy process. At long last, in the editorial team of Charles Rowley and Friedrich Schneider, public choice has its Samuel Johnson.' William F. Shughart II, University of Mississippi, senior editor of The Elgar Companion to Public Choice by William Shughart II, Laura Razzolini (Edward Elgar, 2001) 

Intellectual Property Rights

Intellectual Property Rights and Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of the Trips by Donald G. Richards (M.E.Sharpe) Author Donald G. Richards examines the origins and impact of the agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) negotiated during the Uruguay Round of talks of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The principal theme is that the TRIPS agreement is not in the best social welfare interest of poorer countries, and that its effective imposition on them by richer countries has far more to do with the exercise of political and economic power than it does with the positive economic benefits the agreement's supporters claim it can deliver. Empirical evidence is provided on the impact of intellectual property rights (IPRs) on important economic variables such as export performance, foreign investment, and economic growth. Case studies illustrate two important industries where the struggles over intellectual property are especially fierce: the pharmaceutical and agricultural biotechnology sectors. In each of these cases, Richards specifies the IPR issues and demonstrates how the TRIPS operates to define and extend capitalist social relations of production on a global scale. 

Written for advanced undergraduate and graduate courses in international political economy and international relations theory, Intellectual Property Rights and Global Capitalism is an important work focusing on particular aspects of what is increasingly referred to as "the process of globalization." 

Donald G. Richards is professor of economics at Indiana State University where he teaches primarily international economics and political economy. He is the author of numerous articles on the international political economy of poorer countries. He has a particular interest in Latin America and especially the Southern Cone region of South America; he has worked as economic development policy consultant in Paraguay.

The purpose of this book is to examine of the origins and impact of the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS) negotiated during the Uruguay Round of talks of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The principle theme of the book is that the TRIPS agreement is not in the best social welfare interest of the poor countries and that its effective imposition on them by the rich countries has far more to do with the exercise of real political and economic power than it does with the positive economic benefits the agreement's supporters claim it can deliver. To support this assertion, Richards provides a critical examination of the theoretical literature and empirical evidence as they pertain to the impact of intellectual property rights (IPRs) on such important economic variables as export per­formance, foreign investment, and economic growth. This examination dem­onstrates the overall weakness of the positivist economic case in favor of a strong international IPR regime, at least as it applies to the poor countries)

The book then proceeds to provide a political and economic analysis that explains why the poor countries acceded to the TRIPS agreement notwith­standing the lack of positivist economic evidence in favor of its benefits. The analysis here is driven by a theory of the state in the global system which is itself the product of a method Richards describes as "critical eclecticism." By this term Richards means that the approach to state theory as inspired by several well-established traditions in radical political economy and interna­tional relations theory that speak to, or carry implications for, the relations between the state and civil society. The constituent approaches are (1) world systems theory, (2) Gramscian hegemony, and (3) internationalization of capital. Richards’s method is critical in two senses of the word. First, it is critical in the same sense that these constituent traditions are critical. That is, it calls into question the dominant institutional infrastructure by which the global sys­tem is administered, and it advocates fundamental reforms to benefit the world's marginalized majority. Second, it is critical in the sense that it does not attempt to include or reconcile all aspects of each of the three component radical research traditions. It recognizes that each tradition has differences of emphasis and strength and draws on these as they advance the analysis at hand. Richards argues that the three approaches are in fact mutually consistent at a fundamental level. he does not pretend to settle old debates among and between the schools that have often taken on a polemical character in the past.

Having advanced the general political and economic analysis of the TRIPS agreement, the book then proceeds to illustrate with a pair of case studies of two important industries where the struggle over IP is especially strongly waged. These are the pharmaceutical and agricultural biotechnol­ogy sectors. In each of these cases, an attempt is made to specify the IPR issues and demonstrate how the TRIPS agreement operates to define and extend capitalist social relations of production on a global scale. It does this in part, Richards argues, by operating as a mechanism of (Gramscian) consen­sual hegemony. At the same time, it is recognized that ideological struggle is not strictly determined and that the door is open for counterhegemonic efforts. These cases reveal the conditions under which counterhegemony is more likely to succeed.

TRIPS is a relatively recent phenomenon and the literature devoted to its analysis is still relatively undeveloped. Most of the work that has been done in this area by scholars from the developed countries tends to promote the benefits of a strong international IPR regime. Richards knows of no work in this area that approaches the general case of the TRIPS agreement from a radical perspective of political and economic international relations of the type he develops here.

Richards provides a critical review of the traditional philosophical approaches to the concept of property right. It includes a discussion of the Lockean labor theory of property, the Hegelian personality justification, and the utilitarian justification (both in its familiar Benthamite version and its less familiar, but useful, Godwinian interpretation). The approaches inspired by Locke and Hegel are found to fail to offer compelling justifications for private property

in ideas. The utilitarian philosophies, especially that associated with Bentham, also have difficulties. Parallels may be drawn between the applicability of these philosophic approaches to IPRs and to proposals calling for an interna­tional agreement on minimum labor standards for workers. One might well ask why there is no such agreement on trade-related international labor standards (TRILS) that would provide for workers a degree of the protection such as that offered by the TRIPS for those who claim ownership of intellec­tual property. The answer is that advocates for a TRILS agreement have not been able to mobilize nearly as effectively to imprint the emerging interna­tional regulatory infrastructure as have the proponents for stronger IPRs.

Richards examines the institution of intellectual property from the per­spective of positivist economic science. By positivist economic science Richards refers to the research tradition that places primary emphasis on the formulation and tests of hypotheses drawn from abstract models of economic processes. It is well known that this is the dominant research tradition among academic and professional economists. In the examination of this literature, he does not pretend, however, to endorse the positivist approach as a preferred one. To the contrary, I tend to believe that it often results in a very selective and ideologically biased presentation of evidence. It does, however, present evidence of a type nonetheless with which critical social science should con-tend rather than ignore. By critical social science, including critical econom­ics, Richards refers to those research traditions that challenge both the substantive assertions and the methodological premises of the dominant discourse. As opposed to the ahistorical and methodological individualism of positivist economics, critical social science has typically emphasized the importance of historical context and the central role played by groups, including classes.

In this chapter Richards reviews recent theoretical treatments of the effect of patents on various measures of economic welfare and/or important economic policy targets. The findings are generally ambiguous, though the general conclusions seem to suggest that poor nations are better off if left to their own devices in forming an optimal national IPR regime. He also reviews the available econometric evidence on the impact of the strength of IPR regime on certain target variables, such as exports, direct foreign investment (DFI), and the rate of economic growth. Included in this review is my own respecification and test of an empirical model presented in an often cited paper by Lee and Mansfield (1996) that purports to show the beneficial ef­fects of strong IPRs on DFI. These results overturn Lee and Mansfield's find­ings. In general, the empirical evidence is shown to be too weak to support the contention that the TRIPS agreement offers adequate short- or medium-term benefits to justify its accession by poor countries.

The central argument advanced in Chapter 4 is that a political economicanalysis of IPRs requires corresponding theories of the state, class, and capital as they operate in the global economy. Several candidate theories from international political economy and international relations theory are available. Three in particular provide useful insights for the analytical task at hand. These are world systems theory, associated with writers such as Immanuel Wallerstein (1974), Samir Amin (1974), and Arghiri Emmanuel (1972); hegemony theory, inspired by Antonio Gramsci (1971) and devel­oped by Giovanni Arrighi (1993), Robert Cox (1996), and Stephen Gill (1993) among others; and internationalization of capital, theorized by Christian Palloix (1977) and more recently developed by Dick Bryan (1995). For some social scientists the sort of theoretical eclecticism represented by the selec­tive use of elements from this collection of theories may be initially off-putting. Richards hopes to convince the reader, however, that a critical eclecticism is both appropriate and even necessary to the issues at hand.

Richards  applies the findings of the preceding chapter to provide an explanation for the establishment of the TRIPS agreement as part of the inter-national institutional infrastructure governing the capitalist world system. This explanation appeals equally to the concepts of Gramscian (consensual) hegemony and direct (bilateral) coercion. Where the latter is concerned, the role of U.S. trade policy is given emphasis. In this explanation, however, the United States is represented not as an aspiring hegemonic state in the spirit of hegemonic stability theory, but as the representative of a transnational capitalist class. The limitations of other competing interpretations (Van Grasstek 1990; Ryan 1998) are discussed.

Next Richards presents one of two case studies of the application of the TRIPS agreement to specific industrial contexts. The pharmaceutical industry is chosen because it is among the most important to discuss from the perspective of global human welfare and because of the disproportionate influence that transnational drug producers had in influencing the negotiations leading to the establishment of the agreement. The failure of the international pharma­ceutical industry to address the health problems of poor countries is discussed, as is the likely (negative) consequences for the ability of poor countries to devise indigenous solutions to those problems in the face of the TRIPS. The pharmaceutical industry is also presented as a case for which the pros­pects for counterhegemonic organization and struggle are very good, as evi­denced by the recent Doha Declaration.

The second of the two case studies concerns the impact of a strengthened global IPR regime on biotechnology and agriculture. This case study is included because agricultural biotech has important environmental implications as well as tremendous implications for the ability of the world's impoverished to provide themselves with the basic necessities of life. The case makes a useful contrast to the pharmaceutical case study for at least a couple of reasons. First, ag biotech in its IPR dimensions involves not just new commodities, but also new production processes. This fact has important implications for the process of internationalization of capital discussed in other chapters. A second, and perhaps related, reason concerns the appar­ently reduced prospects for successful, counterhegemonic resistance to the power of transnational capital.

Conclusions and lessons for action are considered in the final chapter. This chapter provides a brief discussion of the future of the TRIPS agreement. It then concentrates on drawing general lessons from the two case studies. These lessons are of two sorts. The first set attempts to show how the cases provide support for the general political economic interpretation of the TRIPS agreement. The second set concerns the conditions and limitations of counterhegemonic action and organization.

Information Technology Policy and the Digital Divide: Lessons for Developing Countries edited by Mitsuhiro Kagami, Masatsugu Tsuji, Emanuele Giovannetti (Edward Elgar) The proliferation of new information technologies throughout the world has raised some important questions for policymakers as to how developing countries can benefit from their diffusion. This important volume compares the advantages and disadvantages of the IT revolution through detailed studies of a variety of developed and developing nations and regions: Argentina, Estonia, the EU, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, South Africa, Thailand and the USA.

The authors address a number of challenging issues such as standardization, IT in the mass media, Public Key Infrastructure, upstream connectivity and pricing, and draw out important policy implications for late-comers in this field - predominantly developing countries. They highlight the negative aspects of IT policy such as the digital divide and monopoly of ownership, but also illustrate the potential benefits such as ‘leapfrogging’ the industrialization process and the expansion of broadband capabilities.

This impressive volume will be essential reading for academics and researchers with an interest in development economics, utility regulation and technology policy. It will also be of great practical value to international policymakers and governments in the developing world who wish to learn more about the costs and benefits of regulation and deregulation in the IT industry.

Deregulation and liberalization during the 1990s brought about competition in the telecommunications sector. Relaxation of market ownership restrictions and the lowering of entry barriers resulted in cross-market entry and made many combined business activities possible. Coupled with computer and wireless technologies, especially, digitization produced convergence among telecom­munications, computer, and broadcasting industries. As a result, telephony (fixed and mobile), CATV, satellite, computer, and even home appliances have been connected through the Internet. Such services as voice, packet- or circuit-switched data, movies/videos, images (photos), TV, and e-business can be enjoyed by Internet users. Particularly, broadband access services have been expanding and they will be the mainstream in the future network society.

From our joint study we can draw some lessons from the rapidly changing state of the IT revolution, especially from the developing countries' point of view. Negative aspects are: (i) digital divide and universal service; (ii) monopoly and hegemony; and (iii) demand considerations, while the positive sides are: (iv) leapfrogging the industrialization process; and (v) broadband expansion.

This study notices  disparities in Internet access among socio-economic groups are growing in all countries. It is observed that higher income groups can better utilize the Internet than other income groups. Education and ethnicity also affect Internet diffusion. In particular, large cities are unevenly distributed in Internet use and the urban poor have very limited access. In addition, the gap between rural and urban areas is also expanding. An even more serious issue from our point of view is the disparity among developing countries.

It is clearly detected that Latin America as a region lags far behind East Asia in terms of Internet penetration. According to the International Telecommuni­cation Union (ITU), Chile, the leading regional country in Internet use (1155 per ten thousand inhabitants in 2000) is less than Malaysia (1590), the sixth ranked (after Korea, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan) in East Asia. Why is Internet penetration in Latin America delayed? There are mainly four reasons though the situation varies country by country. First, there exist enormous income disparities that cause low penetration. Low income groups cannot have Internet access even in advanced countries, so this tendency is strengthened in Latin America. Moreover, as broadband access develops, these deficiencies will further intensify.

Second, the lack of basic infrastructure is crucial. Telephone networks are bases for Internet connection. DSL/ADSL also use these telephone lines. Prompt and secure mail delivery services are very important for e-business for distrib­uting ordered online products. Stable electricity supply is also essential for computers and IT-related equipment. It is said that basic infrastructure and services remain weak in Latin America.

Third, privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) did not necessarily bring about efficient Internet diffusion. During the 1980s and 1990s state-owned telephone companies were privatized in the region but these incumbent companies still have monopolistic power and interconnection charges were not lowered as had been initially thought.

Fourth, Latin America lacks interconnection between major network access points within the region. More concerted investment efforts for interconnec­tion are required.

Regarding universal service or universal access, more efforts should be made to increase public/private access centres to underserved and disadvantaged groups. Although some countries in Latin America have their own plans to establish telecentres and discount Internet rates, examples from other countries such as `E-rate grants' and the Technology Opportunity Program (TOP) in the US, `telecottages' in Hungary, the `Village Road Programme' in Estonia, and `PC-bangs' in Korea are useful.

Generally speaking, new entrants in Internet access businesses have two options: to build new networks or to lease lines from incumbent carriers. As mentioned above, incumbent telecommunications companies have monopolistic power due to their huge sunk cost and influential stakeholders such as the government and powerful politicians, so access prices failed to decline as expected in developing countries (they have gradually decreased due to competition and new entrants such as cable and satellite TV as compared with ten years ago, for example). However, an even more complicated problem has emerged regarding interconnection charges.

Simply put, Internet connection has three tiers of groups: final users, Internet service providers (ISPs), and Internet backbone providers (IBPs). In this geo­graphical classification, price structure is basically divided into two: retail prices which users pay for ISPs (prices for the `last mile'), and wholesale prices which ISPs pay for IBPs (sometimes called `upstream' connectivity prices). IBPs are generally global conglomerates such as AT&T and Sprint. Because of technical reasons it is difficult to trace packet-data information routes. Moreover, confi­dential contracts among carriers make wholesale price structures ambiguous. Recent trends of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) among large IBPs have made this problem more complex. Potential anti-competitive activities should be monitored. In this volume tracing the information routes (number of hops) was examined and these trials will help with efforts to understand prices in upstream connectivity.

Standards and intellectual property rights are another issue. International standards have often been used as a global strategy, or hegemony, to sell own products by multinational corporations (MNCs) or even governments of advanced countries. In the high-tech world, innovations become very complex and difficult to understand, backed by enormous R&D investment. Recent examples include third-generation cellular phones, digital TV methods, and encryption for online networks. Some measures are necessary to control these hegemonic movements and to bring transparency in decision-making of de jure standards. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the US government offered the advanced encryption standard (AES) for e-government use for public sub­scription in 1997. By the same token, industrial ownership or intellectual property rights have also sometimes been misused for latecomer developing countries. Recent WTO decisions to produce generic HIV drugs at a lower cost than the original royalty payment is a good example of a situation where mod­ifications to the present system can be carried out if necessary.

High-tech products are sometimes too high-tech. People do not want to deal with overly complex equipment or contents that are too sophisticated. Multi-functional equipment with a high price tag all too often does not correspond with the wishes of consumers who want simple functions. It is very important to read consumers' preferences and people's real demands, something that suppliers or producers often forget. Sometimes IT machines seem to exist for themselves, not for users.

Japan's failures illustrate this point. NTT invested heavily in ISDN but users ignored it because of its slow download time. NHK's invention of analogue-type high definition TV was also left on the shelf after digital TV appeared.

Both giant companies invested heavily in the wrong products and their invest­ments were never recovered.

Governments also fail in discerning real demand and allocate limited budgets for bad projects. Too many over-the-top IT plans such as the Multimedia Super Corridor in Malaysia have been promoted far outstripping people's demands. In this regard, hasty and expensive terrestrial digital TV projects in Japan and Brazil seem to be under scrutiny from the demand point of view.

It is interesting that the growth and dissemination of mobile phones in developing countries that generally have very limited traditional telephone copper-line networks have been so rapid. Basically in this situation the wireless or cellular phone networks leapfrog the fixed line system. This sort of leapfrogging ('digital jump') can be observed in other high-tech industries such as IT.

Analysis in this volume of the Indian software industry suggests that certain developing countries may follow a different, not the traditional path, to successful industrialization. It concludes that Indian domestic firms may follow an alternative route in overcoming the difficulties of promotion and join the high value club after comparing profiles of three types of software entities in India: foreign firms; domestic firms with foreign subsidiaries; and domestic firms. The software sector has two distinct characteristics. One advantage is its absence of backward linkages, or what we call an `island of competitive­ness'. The other is its small initial investment due to knowledge intensity. Due to these characteristics we can set up software businesses anywhere.

However, a pre-condition may be relatively high education levels in English, mathematics and computer sciences. Moreover, location – a place where knowledge is agglomerated such as proximity to universities or national research centres, or where satellite links are easily facilitated – is also important.

We have to carefully watch the Indian case further and hope that some developing countries can use the software sector as leverage for development.

Basic trends can be observed in the IT revolution in terms of structural changes. That is: (a) from fixed to mobile telephone; (b) from telephony to the Internet; and (c) from narrowband to broadband. Particularly, the growth of high speed Internet or broadband access (DSL/ADSL, CATV, FTTH, and FWA) is unprecedented. Demand is expected to increase further, if access prices go down and content quality improves. Therefore, for further broadband expansion the following points must be addressed.

First, new entry and competition should be promoted to reduce access prices. Second, distribution of quality contents needs to be promoted. The arrival of easily accessed broadband can act as a `big bang' to get away from the present IT recession.

In the near future multimedia convergence will take place and TVs and PCs will have the same function in the digital age. Third-generation mobile phones can be used as a high speed information terminal communicating voice, data, and pictures. Portable PCs with wireless LAN cards can work as small intelligent offices if handy wireless LAN boxes are facilitated in nearby shops like restau­rants and coffee stands in towns. We hope that technological progress will find astonishing breakthroughs for enriching our lives at lower cost. However, as we progress into this `Brave New World' we should not forget about the disadvantaged groups of people in developing countries and in pockets of developed countries who are excluded from benefiting from such achievements.

Urban Renewal

The Slaughter of Cities: Urban Renewal as Ethnic Cleansing E. Michael Jones (St. Augustine’s Press) By now, it should be obvious that the government-sponsored initiative to renew this country's large cities which began in the 1930s and continued largely unabated in the East and Midwest through the 1960s and beyond has been a profound and devastating failure. More homes were destroyed than were ever built; once-great metropolises like Detroit lay in ruins; once-thriving neighbor-hoods were overwhelmed with drugs and crime; buildings that were built to last centuries fell to the wrecking ball mere decades after they were built; an entire generation of young people, both those who came to the cities and those who were driven from the cities into the suburbs, have grown up rootless, in a Hobbesian state in which man's life was "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short."

The traditional explanation, the one which no one believes anymore, is that all this was done to eliminate "blight." A more recent explanation, only slightly less implausible, is that it all came about because of faulty design, as if a nation of 260 million people, one which had already produced the Columbian Exhibi­tion of 1893, couldn't come up with any-thing more inspiring that the average strip mall. The real story, it turns out, is different from both previous explana­tions. What began as the World War II intelligence community's attempt to solve America's "nationalities problem" and provide workers for the nation's war industries degenerated by the early post-war period into full-blown ethnic cleans­ing.

E. Michael Jones has followed the advice of Christopher Wrenn. Looking around, he saw monuments, but monu­ments to the folly and malice of social engineering and a government that had declared war on large segments of itsown people. In his meticulously docu­mented book, he proves that urban renewal had more to do with ethnicity than it ever had to do with design or hygiene or blight. Urban renewal was the last gasp attempt of the WASP ruling class to take control of a country that was slipping out of its grasp for demographic reasons. The largely Catholic ethnics were to be driven out of their neighbor-hoods into the suburbs, where they were to be "Americanized" according to WASP principles. The neighborhoods they left behind were to be turned over to the sharecroppers from the South or turned into futuristic Bauhaus enclaves for the new government elites. Using political tactics like eminent domain and "integra­tion," the planners made sure that the ethnic neighborhood got transformed into something more congenial to their dreams of social engineering than the actual communities of people they saw as a threat to their control.

The Slaughter of Cities proposes a new take on familiar territory, e.g., to give just one example, the civil rights movement. Does anyone, for example, really know why Martin Luther King abandoned his southern strategy and came to Chicago during the summer of 1966? Does anyone really know who brought him there? Does anyone know who told him which ethnic neighborhoods he would march through? Hint: it was a religious denom­ination usually associated with Philadelphia that had been at work try­ing to "integrate" Chicago's neighbor-hoods since 1951.

Jones concentrates on four cities — Boston, Philadelphia, Detroit, and Chicago — in a book whose conclusions will be shocking and controversial. The destruction of the ethnic neighborhoods that made up the human, residential heart of these cities was not an unfortunate by-product of a well-intentioned plan that somehow went awry; it was part of the plan itself.

Excerpt: The scale of the devastation which the Philadelphia City Planning Commission pre-pared for Philadelphia was simply breathtaking in scope. All of North Philadelphia from Diamond (the border would later be moved north to Lehigh) to Spring Garden Street and from Broad to 5th was scheduled to be torn down. The same fate awaited all of "East" Philadelphia from Vine Street north of Market to Tasker in the south, and from 8th Street to the Delaware River. All of what is traditionally known as South Philadelphia from South Street to Dickinson and from Broad to the famous 9th Street Market was also scheduled to be torn down, even though the best housing stock in South Philadelphia, owned by the Italian elite, doctors, lawyers, etc., was to be found along Broad Street.

The most shocking part of the map, however, lay in the gray-hatched patch off to the northeast well outside of the intensive-use central area where some of the city's oldest housing stock existed. That part of town was known as Bridesburg. It was, like Kensington, which lay to the south, industrial and residential combined, which was the pattern of industrial 19th-century Philadelphia. What Bridesburg did not have was run-down houses. What Bridesburg did have was ethnic homogeneity. It housed the over­whelming majority of the Polish population of Philadelphia. Ask those who know the his­tory of urban renewal in Philadelphia today why Bridesburg was targeted for destruction, and you will get no answer. That is so for one simple reason: according to the criteria which the renewers themselves established, Bridesburg was not blighted, if by blight one means deteriorated housing stock. Bridesburg was a mixed-use neighborhood, but so was just about all of the rest of old Philadelphia. The trouble with Bridesburg lay not in its buildings.

When I asked one of the priests at St. John Cantius parish, which serves the Polish population there, why the planned destruction didn't happen, he couldn't come up with an answer either. But the answer in both instances has to do with ethnicity. Bridesburg survived because the Poles refused to move from the neighborhood. Unlike their Irish co-reli­gionists, they were not seduced by the siren song of assimilation. The same thing can be seen in Polish neighborhoods like Hamtramck near Detroit. The Poles who were success­ful didn't move to the suburbs when they made money. Instead, they tore down the con­ventional housing stock and built a brick palace in its place.

Bridesburg was not blighted, but it was Polish. The Philadelphia Planning Commis­sion, like the Philadelphia Housing authority, the agencies which plotted this destruction had no Poles on their boards or planning commissions. As a result, what went by the name of urban renewal was, in effect, one ethnic group, namely the WASPs from Germantown and Chestnut Hill, coming up with a plan for destroying the neighborhood of another eth­nic group, without that group's consultation or permission, even when the obvious indica­tors of blight were missing. Taken as a whole the Planning Commission Map of 1948 was a recipe for ethnic cleansing on a massive scale. The Jews were to be moved from Philadelphia's "East Side" to make way for Society Hill, the residential enclave where the city's Nomenklatura were to be housed; the Italians were to be moved from large areas of South Philadelphia, the Irish from large areas of North Philadelphia. The fact that blacks were to be removed from areas around Temple University and the University of Pennsylvania would mean more ethnic cleansing for the Catholic ethnics as well, as wave after wave of displaced blacks would have to seek housing in adjacent, which is to say, Catholic and ethnic, areas. Each instance of urban renewal and redevelopment was like a rock dropped into a pool. The number of units of public housing which got built never equaled the number of units which got torn down, and as a result, more blacks got dis­placed than got housed by government efforts. As a result, Catholic ethnics were either removed directly, when their houses got torn down to make way for the projects, or indi­rectly by the waves of blacks who had to move to neighborhoods adjacent in price and geography when the houses they were living in were torn down and never replaced.

This book tells the story of housing policy and social engineering in four large cities in the period during and following World War II. Since housing was just one focus of social engineering, this book tells other related stories as well, all of which had an impact on these cities. There was a time when the Western World, and many Americans, believed in progress. As anyone who has seen the rebirth of cities in Europe after their destruction during the war can say, that progress is not a mark of American cities. This book is an attempt to explain why. The fundamental fact, however, is available to anyone who takes the time to go beyond the showcase buildings at the center of downtown Detroit or Philadelphia and look at the poverty and destruction that surround them in what were once thriving neighborhoods. If you require a monument to the folly of the social engineering that brought about that devastation, just look around. 

Archeology

Bronze Age Economics: The First Political Economies by Timothy Earle (Westview) has set out to offer the most comprehensive view now available of the economic foundations of early societies, and it may well be that he has succeeded. Bronze Age Economics is a pioneering contribution to archaeological theory." -Colin Renfrew, University of Cambridge

"This important collection brings together many of Timothy Earle's key contributions, thus comprising a coherent guide to Earle's materialist approach to the evolution of those intermediate-level societies classically called `chiefdoms.' Earle has made a significant mark on the field, and his anthology deserves to be in the library of every serious student and professional." -Patrick V Kirch, University of California, Berkeley

"An outstanding example of the power and promise of processual archaeological approaches to understanding prehistoric cultural variability." Jeffrey Parsons, University of Michigan

This integrated collection of new and newly revised essays by archaeologist Timothy Earle represents both a personal journey and a growing synthesis of how political economies emerged in human societies. Drawing in detail on the cases of chiefdoms in Hawaii, the Andes, and Denmark, Bronze Age Economics documents how intensification of economies, surplus mobilization, and controlled distribution of both staple and prestige goods fundamentally drove the political evolutionary processes that prefigured states. Representing as it does the trajectory of Earle's lifework, this book fairly encapsulates the history of processual archaeology and social evolutionary theory over the past quarter century.

Finance 

Contributions to Financial Econometrics: Theoretical and Practical Issues by Michael McAleer (Blackwell) This is the fifth volume in the series Surveys of Recent Research in Economics. The series is intended to help busy academics and practitioners keep abreast of important developments that relate to, without necessarily being narrowly focused on, their more specific interests. This particular volume should be of interest to academic economists, as well as practitioners engaged in finance and econometrics. The contributions are accessible to advanced undergraduates and provide useful supplementary reading for a wide variety of courses in both Economics and Finance.

For researchers who are intending to undertake applied research in financial econometrics, it is important to reflect upon a number of questions: (i) Which theoretical model is to be chosen, and why? (ii) What restrictions are to be imposed or tested? (iii) Which hypotheses are to be tested, and why? (iv) What method of estimation is to be used? (v) What are the theoretical properties of the estimation method used? and (vi) Which statistical and econometric softwares are to be used, and how accurate and efficient are they? If the intending researcher does not know the answers to some or all of these questions, the papers presented in this volume will provide state-of-the-art guidance as to how to proceed. A failure to address these issues seriously will lead to the presentation of unconvincing empirical results, as well as to the criticism of `measurement without (structural, statistical and econometric) theory'. 

The first survey paper by W. K. Li (University of Hong Kong), Shiqing Ling (Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) and Michael McAleer (University of Western Australia) is `Some Recent Theoretical Results for Time Series Models with GARCH Errors'. Following the pathbreaking work on developing the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH) model by Engle (1982), which is clearly one of the most widely-cited papers in econometrics over the last few decades, the area of time-varying conditional volatility has had many theoretical contributions in recent years. There have been many extensions of ARCH, including: the highly popular symmetric and asymmetric (namely, GJR) GARCH; logarithmic, exponential, quadratic, power and other non-linear representations; fractional, threshold and smooth transition variants; and multivariate versions, including constant and variable dynamic correlation GARCH models, among many others. Some of these models, particularly ARCH and GARCH, have been analysed in detail with respect to the regularity (or structural) conditions underlying the strict stationarity and ergodicity of the process, the necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of moments, and the sufficient conditions for the (typically) least squares, quasi-maximum likelihood or adaptive estimators to be consistent and asymptotic normal. The authors review some of the more recent and important theoretical results for time-varying conditional volatility models with (symmetric) GARCH errors. In view of the straightforward analytical conditions that have been derived, the survey is directed towards practitioners. Starting with the simple univariate ARCH model and proceeding to the multivariate GARCH model, some structural and statistical results for stationary and non-stationary ARMA-GARCH models are sum­marised. Various new ARCH-type models, including double threshold ARCH and GARCH, fractional ARIMA, CHARMA, and a class of symmetric vector ARMA-GARCH, are also reviewed. Some new and powerful unit root tests based on quasi-maximum likelihood estimators are also discussed and compared with existing procedures.

Esther Ruiz (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid) and Lorenzo Pascual (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid) follow a theoretical contribution by considering `Bootstrapping Financial Time Series'. As time series of high frequency financial returns are often characterized by fat-tailed non-Gaussian distributions (that is, volatility clustering and excess kurtosis), usually of unknown form, bootstrap techniques are especially suited for empirical analysis in such cases. However, when bootstrap procedures are applied to financial data, it must be realised that, although returns are usually serially uncorrelated, they are not independent. The volatility of returns evolves over time, so that squared returns are dependent. There are two main types of bootstrap methods designed to replicate this dynamic dependence: (i) it is possible to use parametric bootstrap procedures, based on resampling from the estimated residuals of a conditionally heterocedastic model; (ii) non-parametric bootstrapping can be performed without assuming a particular model for returns. This paper critically reviews the application of both bootstrap methods for the empirical analysis of financial time series data, with an emphasis on inference and prediction. Several empirical and simulated examples are presented to illustrate these methods. The main applications can be classified into methods that try to estimate the sample distribution of a given statistic and methods to estimate the density of returns. In the first group, the main application analyzes the predictive power of technical trading rules. Within the second class, the main application obtains measures of the Value at Risk (VaR) of a given asset. One of the main problems encountered in the surveyed papers is that quite a few apply the bootstrap procedure incorrectly by resampling directly from the raw returns. Finally, the authors note that there are very few results regarding the theoretical properties of bootstrap methods in the context of non-linear models and, in particular, for heterocedastic models, which are of particular relevance in the analysis of financial returns.

`Some Recent Developments in Futures Hedging' by Donald Lien (University of Texas at San Antonio) and Y. K. Tse (Singapore Management University) reviews some recent developments in the literature of futures hedging. It is assumed that hedgers are faced with a given spot position to hedge, so that the problem of hedging quantity uncertainty is not discussed. Various theories of futures hedging are discussed. An optimal hedge strategy is traditionally based on the expected-utility maximization paradigm, a simplification of which leads to the minimum-variance criterion. Although this paradigm is quite well accepted, alternative approaches have been proposed, particularly the questionable use of variance as a measure of risk. It is argued that as far as hedging is concerned, a one-sided measure such as the downside risk is more relevant, which leads to the use of lower partial moments as an alternative criterion to variance. In addition, the application of the theories of stochastic dominance has resolved some of the restrictions in the expected-utility maximization framework. Given the parallel developments in the stochastic dominance literature, the mean-Gini approach also facilitates the implementation of a hedge strategy. All of these alternative theories are discussed and compared. At the empirical level, research on futures hedging has benefited from developments in the econometrics literature. As more has become known about the statistical properties of financial time series, more sophisticated estimation methods have been proposed. For example, the classical regression method, which assumes a time-invariant hedge ratio, has been replaced by time-varying estimates. The cointegration literature suggests that futures and spot prices are cointegrated and that better estimates can be obtained by exploring this relationship. Moreover, the conditional volatility literature has provided many models to capture the time-varying variance and covariance of the spot and futures prices. Finally, the use of nonparametric methods has freed researchers from making assumptions that may not be justifiable, such as normality in asset returns.

Tom Engsted (Aarhus School of Business) surveys the literature on econometric time series methods and approaches for evaluating the fit of rational expectations models in `Measures of Fit for Rational Expectations Models'. Since the inception of rational expectations econometrics in the 1970s, the standard approach to estimate and formally test rational expectations models has been either: (i) the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) and its associated J-test; or (ii) the full-information methodology with explicit specification of stochastic processes for the forcing variables and derivation and testing of the implied cross-equation restrictions. However, this approach has been criticized because formal statistical tests of over identifying restrictions are not very informative about the accuracy of the underlying model. A model that is statistically rejected at a 5% level may be able to explain important aspects of the data, just as a model that is not statistically rejected may not have much economic content. The author describes

and illustrates three alternatives for evaluating rational expectations models that have been suggested in the literature as a response to this criticism: the Campbell-Shiller, Durlauf-Hall, and Hansen-Jagannathan approaches. A characteristic feature of these methods is that they are much less focused on formal statistical testing, but examine the degree to which a particular model provides a useful approximation to reality. All three methods have become very popular and widely used in empirical research. The author summarizes the many empirical studies that have used these methods in areas such as stock price determination and asset pricing, interest rates and the term structure, exchange rate determination, consumption and saving, the balance of payments, tax-smoothing, hyperinflation, and linear quadratic adjustment cost models of inventories, labour demand, and money demand. An illustration of the methods using data from the Danish stock market is also provided. The survey pays particular attention to the mean­nonstationarity that characterizes many financial and macroeconomic time series.

Asset pricing is analysed by P. N. Smith (University of York) and M. R. Wickens (University of York) in `Asset Pricing With Observable Stochastic Discount Factors'. The stochastic discount factor (SDF) model is rapidly emerging as the most general and convenient way to price assets. By a suitable specification of the discount factor, the SDF model can be shown to encompass most of the theories currently in use, including the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), the general equilibrium consumption-based intertemporal CAPM, and the Black-Scholes theorem for pricing options. The SDF model has been based on the use of single and multiple factors, and on latent and observed factors. In most situations, and particularly for the term structure, single factor models are inappropriate, while latent variables require the somewhat arbitrary specification of generating processes, which can also be difficult to interpret. Focusing primarily on the absolute rather than relative approach to asset pricing, the authors survey the principal different implementations of the SDF model for FOREX, equity and bonds. They propose a new approach, which is based on the use of multiple factors that are observable, and on modelling the joint distribution of excess returns and the factors using a multivariate GARCH-in-mean process. In comparison, much of the research to date that has made explicit use of the SDF model has been based on latent factors. The authors argue that, in general, single equation and VAR models, although widely used in empirical finance, are inappropriate as they do not satisfy the no-arbitrage condition. As risk premia arise from conditional covariation between the returns and factors, both a multivariate context and the use of conditional covariances in the conditional mean are essential. The authors explain how apparent exceptions, such as the CIR and Vasicek models, meet these requirements, but at a price. The new approach is explained, its implementation is discussed, and some empirical evidence is presented. For purposes of comparison, the paper also includes recent evidence using more traditional approaches.

In the final contribution, which is not a standard survey paper, `GARCH 2.2: An Ox Package for Estimating and Forecasting Various ARCH Models', Sebastien Laurent (Universite de Liege, Universite Catholique de Louvain and Maastricht University) and Jean-Philippe Peters (Universite de Liege) discuss and

document GARCH 2.2, an Ox package for estimating and forecasting various univariate ARCH-type models. There is a focus on asymmetric and long-memory models as the package provides GARCH, EGARCH, GJR, APARCH, IGARCH, FIGARCH, HYGARCH, FIEGARCH and FIAPARCH specifica­tions of the conditional variance, and an AR(FI)MA specification of the conditional mean. Two versions of this package are available, namely a menu-driven interface for OxPack users (the `Full' version) and a simple code version for Ox console users (the `Light' version). These models can be estimated by an approximate (quasi) maximum likelihood method under four different assump­tions: normal, Student-t, GED, or skewed Student-t errors. In addition, estimated parameters can be bounded between or fixed at some predefined values, while positivity constraints and conditions for the existence of moments can be checked for several of the models. Explanatory variables can enter both the conditional mean and the conditional variance equations. Moreover, h-step-ahead forecasts of both the conditional mean and the conditional variance are available, as well as a number of mispecification tests and various graphical possibilities. The authors propose an overview of the features of the package, with a presentation of the different specifications of the conditional mean and conditional variance. Further explanations are given about the estimation methods. Measures of the accuracy of the procedures are presented for both short and long memory models. The GARCH features provided by the GARCH package are compared with those of nine other well-known econometric software packages. Finally, a practical application of GARCH 2.2 using the CAC40 stock index is provided and presented as a short, accessible and helpful user guide. 

Science

Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation by Stefan H. Thomke (Harvard Business Schooll Press) Experimentation matters because it fuels the discovery and creation of knowledge and thereby leads to the development and improvement of products, processes, systems, and organizations. Put concretely, without experimentation, we might all still be living in caves and using rocks as tools. Anything we use today arrives through a process of organized experimentation, over time; improved tools, new processes, and alter­native technologies all have arisen because they have been worked out in various structured ways.

But experimentation has often been expensive in terms of the time involved and the labor expended, even as it has been essential to innova­tion. What has changed, particularly given new technologies available, is that it is now possible to perform more experiments in an economically viable way while accelerating the drive toward innovation.

Experimentation Matters emphasizes not only why experimentation matters in the largest sense of its connection to innovation, but why and how new tech­nologies are transforming its economics. Not only can more experiments be run today, the kinds of experiments possible are expanding. Never before has it been so economically feasible to ask "what-if" questions and generate preliminary answers. New technologies enable organiza­tions to both challenge presumed answers and pose more questions. They amplify how innovators learn from experiments, creating the potential for higher research and development (R&D) performance and new ways of creating value for firms and their customers. At the same time, this book discusses companies that do not fully unlock that potential because how they design, organize, and manage their ap­proach to innovation gets in the way. That is, even deploying new technology for experimentation, these organizations are not organized to capture its potential value-in experimentation or in innovation. Like any effective experiment, this book will reveal what does and does not work.

Experimentation encompasses success and failure; it is an iterative process of understanding what doesn't work and what does. Both results are equally important for learning, the goal of any experiment and of experimentation overall. Thus, a crash test that results in unac­ceptable safety for drivers, a software user interface that confuses cus­tomers, or a drug that is toxic can all be desirable outcomes of an exper­iment-provided these results are revealed early in an innovation process and can be subsequently reexamined. Because few resources have been committed in these early stages, decision making is still flexi­ble, and other approaches can be experimented with quickly. In a nut­shell, experiments that result in failure are not failed experiments, although they frequently are considered so when anything deviating from what was intended is deemed "failure."

Every company's ability to innovate depends on a process of experimentation whereby new products and services are created and existing ones improved. But the cost of experimentation often limits innovation. New technologies­including computer modeling and simulation­promise to lift that constraint by changing the economics of experimentation. Never before has it been so economically feasible to ask "what-if" questions and generate preliminary answers. These technologies amplify the impact of learn­ing, paving the way for higher R&D performance and innovation and new ways of creating value for customers.

In Experimentation Matters, Thomke argues that to unlock such potential, companies must not only understand the power of experi­mentation and new technologies, but also change their processes, organization, and management of innovation. He explains why experimentation is so critical to innovation, underscores the impact of new technologies, and outlines what managers must do to integrate them successfully.

Drawing on a decade of research in multiple industries as diverse as automotive, semiconduc­tors, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and banking, Thomke provides striking illustrations of how companies drive strategy and value creation by accommodating their organizations to new experimentation technologies. As in the outcome of any effective experiment, Thomke also reveals where that has not happened, and explains why. In particular, he shows managers how to:

  • Implement "front-loaded" innovation processes that identify potential problems before
  • resources are committed and design decisions locked in
  • Experiment and test frequently without overloading their organizations
  • Integrate new technologies into the current innovation system
  • Organize for rapid experimentation
  • Fail early and often but avoid wasteful "mistakes"
  • Manage projects as experiments

Pointing to the custom integrated circuit industry-a multibillion dollar market-Thomke also shows what happens when new experi­mentation technologies are taken beyond firm boundaries, thereby changing the way com­panies create new products and services with customers and suppliers.

Probing and thoughtful, Experimentation Matters should influence how both executives and academics think about experimentation in gen­eral and innovation processes in particular. Experimentation has always been the engine of innovation, and Thomke reveals how it works today. 

Econometric Analysis (5th Edition) by William H. Greene (Prentice Hall) is intended for a one‑year graduate course in econometrics for social scientists. The prerequisites for this course should include calculus, mathematical statistics, and an introduction to econometrics at the level of, say, Gujarati's Basic Econometrics (McGraw‑Hill, 1995) or Wooldridge's Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach [South‑Western (2000)]. Self‑contained (for our purposes) summaries of the matrix algebra, mathematical statistics, and statistical theory used later in the book are given in Appendices A through D. Appendix E contains a description of numerical methods that will be useful to practicing econometricians. The formal presentation of econometrics begins with discussion of a fundamental pillar, the linear multiple regression model, in Chapters 2 through 8. Chapters 9 through 15 present familiar extensions of the single linear equation model, including nonlinear regression, panel data models, the generalized regression model, and systems of equations. The linear model is usually not the sole technique used in most of the contemporary literature. In view of this, the (expanding) second half of this book is devoted to topics that will extend the linear regression model in many directions. Chapters 16 through 18 present the techniques and underlying theory of estimation in econometrics, including GMM and maximum likelihood estimation methods and simulation based techniques. We end in the last four chapters, 19 through 22, with discussions of current topics in applied econometrics, including time‑series analysis and the analysis of discrete choice and limited dependent variable models.

This book has two objectives. The first is to introduce students to applied econometrics, including basic techniques in regression analysis and some of the rich variety of models that are used when the linear model proves inadequate or inappropriate. The second is to present students with sufficient theoretical background that they will recognize new variants of the models learned about here as merely natural extensions that fit within a common body of principles. Thus, I have spent what might seem to be a large amount of effort explaining the mechanics of GMM estimation, nonlinear least squares, and maximum likelihood estimation and GARCH models. To meet the second objective, this book also contains a fair amount of theoretical material, such as that on maximum likelihood estimation and on asymptotic results for regression models. Modern software has made complicated modeling very easy to do, and an understanding of the underlying theory is important.

I had several purposes in undertaking this revision. As in the past, readers continue to send me interesting ideas for my "next edition." It is impossible to use them all, of course. Because the five volumes of the Handbook of Econometrics and two of the Handbook of Applied Econometrics already run to over 4,000 pages, it is also unnecessary. Nonetheless, this revision is appropriate for several reasons. First, there are new and interesting developments in the field, particularly in the areas of microeconometrics (panel data, models for discrete choice) and, of course, in time series, which continues its rapid development. Second, I have taken the opportunity to continue fine‑tuning the text as the experience and shared wisdom of my readers accumulates in my files. For this revision, that adjustment has entailed a substantial rearrangement of the material‑the main purpose of that was to allow me to add the new material in a more compact and orderly way than I could have with the table of contents in the 4th edition. The literature in econometrics has continued to evolve, and my third objective is to grow with it. This purpose is inherently difficult to accomplish in a textbook. Most of the literature is written by professionals for other professionals, and this textbook is written for students who are in the early stages of their training. But I do hope to provide a bridge to that literature, both theoretical and applied.

This book is a broad survey of the field of econometrics. This field grows continually, and such an effort becomes increasingly difficult. (A partial list of journals devoted at least in part, if not completely, to econometrics now includes the Journal of Applied Econometrics, Journal of Econometrics, Econometric Theory, Econometric Reviews, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Empirical Economics, and Econometrlca.) Still, my view has always been that the serious student of the field must start somewhere, and one can successfully seek that objective in a single textbook. This text attempts to survey, at an entry level, enough of the fields in econometrics that a student can comfortably move from here to practice or more advanced study in one or more specialized areas. At the same time, I have tried to present the material in sufficient generality that the reader is also able to appreciate the important common foundation of all these fields and to use the tools that they all employ.

There are now quite a few recently published texts in econometrics. Several have gathered in compact, elegant treatises, the increasingly advanced and advancing theoretical background of econometrics. Others, such as this book, focus more attention on applications of econometrics. One feature that distinguishes this work from its predecessors is its greater emphasis on nonlinear models. Computer software now in wide use has made estimation of nonlinear models as routine as estimation of linear ones, and the recent literature reflects that progression. My purpose is to provide a textbook treatment that is in line with current practice. The book concludes with four lengthy chapters on time‑series analysis, discrete choice models and limited dependent variable models. These nonlinear models are now the staples of the applied econometrics literature. This book also contains a fair amount of material that will extend beyond many first courses in econometrics, including, perhaps, the aforementioned chapters on limited dependent variables, the section in Chapter 22 on duration models, and some of the discussions of time series and panel data models. Once again, I have included these in the hope of providing a bridge to the professional literature in these areas.

I have had one overriding purpose that has motivated all five editions of this work. For the vast majority of readers of books such as this, whose ambition is to use, not background theory is extremely important. But, at the end of the day, my purpose in writing this work, and for my continuing efforts to update it in this now fifth edition, is to show readers how to do econometric analysis. I unabashedly accept the unflattering assessment of a correspondent who once likened this book to a "user's guide to econometrics." 

Marketing

Brand Portfolio Strategy: Creating Relevance, Differentiation, Energy, Leverage, and Clarity by David A. Aaker (Free Press) Renowned brand guru Aaker demonstrates that assur­ing that each brand in the portfolio has a clear role and actively reinforces and supports the other portfolio brands will profoundly affect the firm's profitability. Brand Portfolio Strategy is required reading not only for brand managers but for all managers with bottom-line responsibility to their shareholders.

In this long-awaited book from the world's premier brand expert and author of the seminal work Building Strong Brands, David Aaker shows managers how to construct a brand portfolio strategy that will support a company's business strategy and create relevance, dif­ferentiation, energy, leverage, and clarity. Building on case studies of world-class brands such as Dell, Disney, Microsoft, Sony, Dove, Intel, CitiGroup, and PowerBar, Aaker demonstrates how powerful, cohe­sive brand strategies have enabled managers to revi­talize brands, support business growth, and create discipline in confused, bloated portfolios of master brands, subbrands, endorser brands, co-brands, and brand extensions.

Aaker offers readers step-by-step advice on what to do when confronting scenarios such as the following:

  • Brands are underleveraged
  • The business strategy is at risk because of inadequate brand platforms
  • The business faces a relevance threat caused by emerging subcategories
  • The firm's brands are tired and bland
  • Strategy is paralyzed by a lack of priority among the brands
  • Brands are cluttered and confusing to both customers and employees
  • The firm needs to move into the super-premium or value arenas to create margin or sales volume
  • Margin pressures require points of differentiation

Excerpt: Firms are motivated to be concerned with brand portfolio strategy be-cause it provides the structure and discipline needed to have a success­ful business strategy. A brand portfolio strategy that is confused and incoherent can handicap and sometimes doom a business strategy. One that fosters organizational and market synergies, creates relevant, differ­entiated and energized brand assets, and leverages those brand assets, on the other hand, will support and enable business strategies.

The need to review brand portfolio strategy tends to become acute when the business becomes stressed because of scenarios such as the following:

  1. A business needs growth to achieve organizational vitality and to realize the objectives of investors. Most growth directions involve either leveraging an existing brand asset and/or creating new brand assets. In either, tools and methods need to be employed to develop and support the strategy.
  2. A business needs to stay relevant in a dynamic market. Subbrands and endorsed brands can help reduce the risk and difficulty of pursuing a new direction.
  3. A business is drifting toward being (or has basically become) a commodity, with very few points of differentiation and an emphasis on price. The challenge is to create a brand or brands that can drive differ­entiation and fit that brand or brands into the brand team.
  4. A brand has lost energy, perhaps because it is in a mature category. There is a need for a branded program, product, sponsorship, or some-thing to create interest and energy.
  5. An acquisition or the emergence of several strong brands forces a firm to make tough choices to avoid confusion and waste.
  6. A firm's long-standing pride in being decentralized and entrepre­neurial has led to a proliferation of brands and subbrands and, as a re­sult, total confusion. Customers and employees alike become frustrated trying to determine not only what the firm stands for in the various product-market settings, but even how to order a product or service. Se­rious pruning, restructuring, and prioritizing are needed.

Brand management simply cannot cope with the complexities of the marketplace with the reality of multiple products, segments, geogra­phies, and distribution channels. In one sense, brand portfolio strategy is part of the problem, because the explosion of brands, subbrands, and endorsed brands in organizations spanning a variety of product-markets has inhibited the ability of firms to articulate coherent strategies, much less implement them. It is also part of the solution, though, because a reasoned, articulated brand structure can support a business strategy by replacing waste with synergy, confusion with clarity, and missed oppor­tunities with leveraged assets. 

This book will be the first to explicitly define the scope and structure of brand portfolio strategy. It will identify underlying concepts and tools and structure them into meaningful and related groupings. It will also il­lustrate how brand portfolio strategy can solve very relevant problems facing business strategists, including the following: 

  • How to grow by expanding the product-market scope through brand extensions.
  • How to participate in value and premium niches with vertical brand extensions.
  • How to keep your brand relevant while facing a dynamic market where "what is being purchased" is changing.
  • How to energize and differentiate your brand using brand portfolio tools.
  • How to make brand alliances work.
  • How to leverage the corporate brand.
  • How to manage the brand issues surrounding corporate restruc­turing.
  • How to improve the clarity of the offerings and provide focus to the brand-building activities.

Developing brand portfolio strategy is complex and situation specific. There are no cookbook-style rules that are guaranteed to produce per­fect strategies. The purpose of this book is to introduce options and is-sues, rather than easy answers.

This is my fourth book on brands and brand strategy. The initial book, Managing Brand Equity, was the first effort to define and struc­ture the concept of brand equity. The second book, Building Strong Brands, introduced brand identity, the brand's aspirational associations, and encouraged managers to look beyond product attributes to brand personality, organizational associations, and brand symbols. The third book, Brand Leadership (written with Erich Joachimsthaler), extended the brand identity concept, discussed global brand management, and showed how to break out of media clutter by developing brand-building programs that extend beyond media advertising.

This book draws on the material relevant to brand portfolio strategy from the other three books. Most notably, Chapters 1 and 2 draw from Brand Leadership, and Chapters 7 and 8 draw from Building Strong Brands and Managing Brand Equity—but even these four chapters are updated with added case studies, new concepts, and new or extended conceptual models. Providing an integrated treatment of brand portfolio strategy has been a major reason for me to write this book. The remain­ing chapters contain largely new material; in total, there is about a 20 percent overlap with the other three books.

As both a confession and apology, I should note that the topic label has changed. In Building Strong Brands, I wrote of "brand systems" to emphasize that the portfolio brands must work together to form a coher­ent whole. However, systems seemed to become an overused engineer­ing term. In Brand Leadership, we changed to "brand architecture," a nice metaphor that suggested foundations, structures, roles, relation-ships, and even the concept of upgrading and refurbishing. Brand archi­tecture was an opaque concept for some, though, and for others suggested the more limited problem of naming brands and developing logos. Thus, in this book a new label, brand portfolio strategy, is used. It is more holistic, strategic, and compatible with the book's thrust—how to optimize and leverage a brand portfolio to enhance and enable busi­ness strategy.

The book includes ten chapters and an epilogue. Chapters 1 and 2 provide a description of the scope of brand portfolio strategy. Chapter 3 examines some inputs that will identify options and issues facing a brand portfolio. How to stay relevant in increasingly dynamic markets is treated in Chapter 4. The tools of branded differentiators and branded energizers are presented for the first time in Chapter 5. Ways to harness

the power of brand alliances are discussed in Chapter 6. Growing by leveraging brand assets horizontally and vertically is explored in Chap­ters 7 and 8. Chapter 9 discusses why and how to leverage the corporate brand. Avoiding complexity and confusion is presented in Chapter 10. The epilogue provides a set of 20 takeaways. 

Buyways: Automobility, Billboards and the American Cultural Landscape by Catherine Gudis (Cultural Spaces: Routledge) The highway has become the buyway. Along the millions of miles the public travels, advertisers spend billions on images of cola, cars, vodka, fast food, and swimming pools that blur past us, catching our fleeting attention and turning the landscape into a corridor of commerce.
A smart, succinct and visually compelling history of the billboard in America, Buyways traces how the outdoor advertising industry changed the face of American commercialism. Taking us from itinerant bill-stickers of circus posters in the 19th century to the blinking, beeping, 3-D eyesores of today, Gudis argues that roadside advertising has turned the landscape itself into a commodity to be bought and sold as advertising space.
Buyways vividly chronicles the battles between environmentalists and businessmen as well as the response of artists, from New Deal photographers who satirized the billboard-infested landscape to commercial artists who embraced the kitsch of it all. It also shows how advertisers tapped into the American mythology of the open road, promoting mobile consumption as the American Dream on four wheels.
Entertaining and brilliantly illustrated, Buyways is a vibrant road map of the new geography of consumption

Buyways: Automobility, Billboards and the American Cultural Landscape is organized around the themes of production, distribution, and con­sumption, in that order. After an overview of billposting before the common use of cars, the first part of this book examines the rise in billboard advertising after World War I by considering the production of both mobile audiences and advertisements. America became "a nation on wheels," and advertisers tried to imagine the new mobile audiences and to communicate with them. Advertisers also attempted to produce the new mobile audiences as commodities to be sold to big business, and to turn the highways through which these audiences trav­eled into corridors of consumption. As part of the project to foster mass con­sumption, outdoor advertisers promoted a culture of mobility and tapped the traditional American mythology of the freedom of the open road. They helped construe automobility as the American Dream on four wheels, a key to the American Way. Part one explores the formal and conceptual strategies adver­tisers employed to foster the culture of mobility, and it describes the develop­ment of an aesthetics of speed specific to the billboard and aiming to appeal to fast-moving audiences without requiring much of them by way of attention, lit­eracy, or thoughtful consideration. The development of the billboard and the diffusion of the marketplace–not to mention the growing rapidity with which audiences in the age of cars, movies, radio, cartoons, and tabloids now expected to receive information and entertainment–ultimately urged the use in advertis­ing of both stereotypes and logos, both among the most important design revo­lutions of twentieth-century propaganda and publicity.

By imprinting the landscape with the signs of commercial exchange, out-door advertising distinguished itself from other media, such as print and radio. The second part of this book examines its unique distribution, the placement of advertisements along highways. This section shows how outdoor advertis­ing helped to decentralize the city and fill the countryside with national adver­tising campaigns as well as retail establishments and potential customers. As the billboard industry evaluated its distribution of billboards and the audiences for them, advertisers realized that their market was not determined by politi­cal boundaries such as city and county lines or central business districts. It is for similar reasons that this study, too, cannot be bound by traditional borders. Some readers may wish to learn more of regional history, but I have con­cluded, along with outdoor advertisers themselves, that their audiences were more flexible than traditional markers of space could contain–they were mar­kets in motion whose travel paid little heed to older precincts of space and time. Recognizing this, advertisers predicted and promoted new commercial developments far from traditional business centers. They did this partly through theatrical displays and an architecture of mobility that acclimated motorists to an exurban culture of spectacle and an auto-oriented consumer landscape, where drivers were encouraged to window shop right through the windshield. Thus outdoor advertisers helped develop fringe areas, laying the pavement for the birth of the commercial strip and the urban sprawl that exploded in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.

That highways would turn into buyways and country roads into "ribbons of gold" was the utopian vision of outdoor advertisers. To others, however, this was a dystopia and a nightmare. Critics felt that markets ought not mix with Mother Nature. Thus, the third part of this book analyzes audience responses to outdoor advertising–in a word, consumption. It focuses on the roadside beautification attempts of civic reformers, and looks at the deeply gender-divided "billboard war" that pitted female roadside reformers against male out-door advertisers. While the "scenic sisters," as they were called by admen, wished to rid the public highway of the signs of commerce, their billboard "brethren" asserted their private right to commercial broadcasting across pub­lic space. Ultimately, their war contested whether Americans ought to preserve certain spaces from the domain of business and of markets. This section reviews the philosophies and aesthetics of each side and analyzes their com­peting–though often complementary–visions of the American pastoral ideal. It portrays the billboard war as a battle over aesthetics, access, economics, and the physical location of markets, and is as much about class ideals as it is about cultural conflict. Part three concludes by describing the swan song of the sce­nic sisters, Lady Bird Johnson's efforts to pass the 1965 Highway Beautification Act (HBA), which limited and called for the removal of many billboards, junk-yards, and roadside stands along the newly constructed interstate expressways. The HBA marked the legal culmination of the billboard war, but has not resolved the continuing conflicts between advertisers and their audiences.

The concluding chapter shows some ways in which the mobile market and its concomitant trail of advertising have influenced more recent decades. The asphalt paths of highway systems and the speed of its automotive travelers raise questions regarding changing forms of visual communication, access to public space, and the aesthetic value of natural and built environments. As the con­clusion suggests, in the twenty-first century new electronic telecommunications technologies, which often use the metaphor of the highway to represent cyber­audience mobility, take the challenges of the scenic sisters to new extremes as the lines between private and public space blur along with what constitutes the public sphere and public discourse, while issues of speed, decentralization, and mobility intensify along the new virtual buyway, the Internet. Buyways thus traces the century-long development of our spatially dispersed landscape of concrete and electronic highways and the advertisements that wrap around them, and ponders the implication of these landscapes, not so much for markets, but for the people that markets are meant to serve. 

Computer Security

Computer Security: Art and Science by Matt Bishop (Addison-Wesley) This highly anticipated book fully introduces the theory and practice of computer security. It is both a comprehensive text, explaining the most fundamental and pervasive aspects of the field, and a detailed reference filled with valuable information for even the most seasoned practitioner. In this one extraordinary volume the author incorporates concepts from computer systems, networks, human factors, and cryptography. In doing so, he effectively demonstrates that computer security is an art as well as a science. Computer Security is simply a superb textbook-- a comprehensive, beautifully written introduction for information security students and practitioners. Matt Bishop has decades of security-related contributions to his credit and his book reflects his accumulated wisdom on all things security. And for those of us who are laboring in the security vineyard, Computer Security represents a rare opportunity to refine our understanding of the fundamentals by tuning in to the thoughts of a master teacher and practitioner.
Computer Security: Art and Science includes detailed discussions on:
* The nature and challenges of computer security
* The relationship between policy and security
* The role and application of cryptography
* The mechanisms used to implement policies
* Methodologies and technologies for assurance
* Vulnerability analysis and intrusion detection

Computer Security discusses different policy models, and presents mechanisms that can be used to enforce these policies. It concludes with examples that show how to apply the principles discussed in earlier sections, beginning with networks and moving on to systems, users, and programs.

This important work is essential for anyone who needs to understand, implement, or maintain a secure network or computer system.

Secure Internet Practices: Best Practices for Securing Systems in the Internet and e-Business Age by Patrick McBride, Jody Patilla, Craig Robinson, Peter Thermos, Edward P. Moser (Auerbach Publications) Is your e-business secure? Have you done everything you can to protect your enterprise and your customers from the potential exploits of hackers, crackers, and other cyberspace menaces? As we expand the brave new world of e-commerce, we are confronted with a whole new set of security problems. Dealing with the risks of Internet applications and e-commerce requires new ways of thinking about security. Secure Internet Practices: Best Practices for Securing Systems in the Internet and e-Business Age presents an overview of security programs, policies, goals, life cycle development issues, infrastructure, and architecture aimed at enabling you to effectively implement security at your organization. In addition to discussing general issues and solutions, the book provides concrete examples and templates for crafting or revamping your security program in the form of an Enterprise-Wide Security Program Model, and an Information Security Policy Framework. Although rich in technical expertise, this is not strictly a handbook of Internet technologies, but a guide that is equally useful for developing policies, procedures, and standards. The book touches all the bases you need to build a secure enterprise. Drawing on the experience of the world-class METASeS consulting team in building and advising on security programs, Secure Internet Practices: Best Practices for Securing Systems in the Internet and e-Business Age shows you how to create a workable security program to protect your organization's Internet risk.

Information Security Risk Analysis by Thomas R. Peltier (Auerbach Publications) Risk is a cost of doing business. The question is, "What are the risks, and what are their costs?" Knowing the vulnerabilities and threats that face your organization's information and systems is the first essential step in risk management. Information Security Risk Analysis shows you how to use cost-effective risk analysis techniques to identify and quantify the threats--both accidental and purposeful--that your organization faces. The book steps you through the qualitative risk analysis process using techniques such as PARA (Practical Application of Risk Analysis) and FRAP (Facilitated Risk Analysis Process) to:oEvaluate tangible and intangible risksoUse the qualitative risk analysis processoIdentify elements that make up a strong Business Impact AnalysisoConduct risk analysis with confidenceManagement looks to you, its information security professional, to provide a process that allows for the systematic review of risk, threats, hazards, and concerns, and to provide cost-effective measures to lower risk to an acceptable level. You can find books that cover risk analysis for financial, environmental, and even software projects, but you will find none that apply risk analysis to information technology and business continuity planning or deal with issues of loss of systems configuration, passwords, information loss, system integrity, CPU cycles, bandwidth, and more. Information Security Risk Analysis shows you how to determine cost effective solutions for your organization's information technology.

Building an Information Security Awareness Program by Mark B. Desman (Auerbach Publications) is a reference and self-study guide. It is step-by-step guide through the methodology for developing, distributing, and monitoring an information security awareness program. Softcover. In his latest book, a pre-eminent information security pundit confessed that he was wrong about the solutions to the problem of information security. It's not technology that's the solution, but the human factor-people. But even infosec policies and procedures are insufficient if employees don't know about them, or why they're important, or what can happen to them if they ignore them. The key, of course, is continuous awareness of the problems and the solutions. Building an Information Security Awareness Program addresses these concerns. A reference and self-study guide, it goes step-by-step through the methodology for developing, distributing, and monitoring an information security awareness program. It includes detailed instructions on determining what media to use and where to locate it, and it describes how to efficiently use outside sources to optimize the output of a small staff. The author stresses the importance of security and the entire organizations' role and responsibility in protecting it. He presents the material in a fashion that makes it easy for nontechnical staff members to grasp the concepts. These attributes render Building an Information Security Awareness Program an immensely valuable reference in the arsenal of the IS professional.

Ecology 

Ecological Economics: Principles and Applicatons by Herman E. Daly, Joshua Farley (Island Press) Part I of this book is an introduction to the subject of ecological econom­ics. Ecological economics seeks not only to explain how the world works, but also to propose mechanisms and institutions for making it work bet-ter. Chapter 1 explains the basic subject matter of neoclassical and eco­logical economics, in order to show the full scope of the new transdiscipline of ecological economics. Having defined the territory, we first establish basic agreement on the fundamental nature of the system we propose to analyze. Chapter 2 begins by describing the core (preanalytic) vision of ecological economics, that the economic system is a part or sub-system of a larger global ecosystem that sustains it. This view is contrasted with the fundamental vision of neoclassical economics, that the economic system is a self-sufficient whole entity unto itself. If we seek to make a sys­tem work better, we need to know the resources available to us—the means—and the desired outcomes—the ends. Chapter 3 focuses on the ends-and-means spectrum, an essential step for understanding a science that defines itself as a mechanism for connecting scarce means to alternative ends.

Part II focuses on the containing and sustaining Whole, the Earth and its atmosphere. In these chapters, we delve deeper into the nature of the Whole—the global ecosystem that sustains us by providing the resources that feed the economic process and the sinks where we dispose of our wastes. Chapter 4 establishes the fundamental importance of low entropy (useful, ordered matter-energy) in economic production, and the in­evitability of its conversion via the economic process to high-entropy, dis­ordered, useless waste. Chapter 5 addresses the tangible forms in which low entropy manifests itself, the abiotic goods and services provided by nature, and examines their specific market-relevant characteristics. Chapter 6 does the same for biotic resources. Chapter 7 shows that many of the goods and services provided by nature were formerly superabundant, and it made little difference if an economic system dedicated to allocating scarce resources ignored them. Now, however, as we have discussed in this Introduction, these resources have become scarce, and their allocation has become critically important.

Part III begins our examination of the part of the whole in which we are most interested, the economic subsystem. We draw out the useful el­ements of neoclassical economic theory and integrate them into ecologi­cal economics. Microeconomics, macroeconomics, or international trade each provides sufficient material for years of study, and this text conveys no more than the essentials.

Chapters 8 and 9 introduce microeconomics, the study of mechanisms for efficiently allocating specific scarce resources among specific alterna­tive ends. They explain the self-organizing properties of a competitive market economy, through which millions of independent decision mak­ers, freely acting in their own self-interest, can generate the remarkable outcomes alluded to at the start of Chapter 1. These chapters also explain how neoclassical production and utility functions must be modified to address the concerns of ecological economics.

In Chapter 10, we take a step back from the traditional microeconomic analysis of allocation to examine the specific characteristics resources must have if they are to be efficiently allocated by the market mechanism. We find that few of the goods and services provided by nature exhibit all of them. Attempts to allocate resources that do not have the appropriate characteristics via the unregulated market result in inefficient, unfair, and unsustainable outcomes. Rather than individual self-interest creating an invisible hand that maximizes social well-being, market allocation of such "nonmarket" goods creates an invisible foot that can kick the common good in the pants. Careful analysis of these market-relevant characteristics of scarce resources is an essential prelude to policy formulation. Thus, Chapter 11 applies the concepts of market failures to abiotic resources, and Chapter 12 applies them to biotic ones.

In Part IV, we turn to macroeconomics. As we stated earlier, ecological economics views the economy as a part of a larger finite system. This means that the traditional goal of macroeconomic policy—unlimited eco­nomic growth in the physical dimension—is impossible. Thus, in ecolog­ical economics, optimal scale replaces growth as a goal, followed by fair distribution and efficient allocation, in that order. Scale and distribution are basically macroeconomic issues. Hence, in addition to the fiscal and monetary policy tools that dominate the discussion in traditional texts, we will introduce policies that can help the economy reach an optimal scale.' Chapter 13 focuses on the basic macroeconomic concepts of GNP, and welfare. It starts by examining economic accounting, or the measurement of desirable ends ranging from gross national product to human needs as­sessment. Chapter 14 discusses the role of money in our economy. Chapter 15 focuses on the issue of distribution within and between generations, and Chapter 16 briefly develops the basic macroeconomic model of how saving and investing behavior combines with the supply and demand of money to determine the interest rate and level of national income. We then relate the macroeconomic model to policy levers de-signed to achieve the ecological economics goals of sustainable scale and just distribution.

Part V addresses international trade. In Chapters 17 and 18, we discuss how different economies interact and the troublesome issue of global eco­nomic integration. We consider especially the consequences of global in­tegration for policy making. Chapter 19 looks at financial issues such as balance of payments and exchange rates, and examines the implications of globalization for macroeconomic policy.

Part VI focuses on policy. Chapter 20 presents the general design prin­ciples of policy. Chapter 21 reviews a number of specific policy options that primarily affect scale, Chapter 22 reviews policies that primarily affect distribution, and Chapter 23 reviews policies that primarily affect allocation.

Our concluding chapter, Looking Ahead, once again reflects on the ethical assumptions of ecological economics. We call for a return to the beginnings of economics as a moral philosophy explicitly directed toward raising the quality of life of this and future generations.

In summary, neoclassical economic theory arose primarily as an effort to explain the market economy. Ecological economics takes a more inclusive, and activist, position. We describe the nature of scarce resources and the ends for which they should be used and proactively prescribe appro­priate institutions for their efficient allocation in a social context of just distribution and sustainable scale. We have the basic allocative institution of the market—it needs improvement, but at least it exists. We have no institution for limiting scale, and our institutions for governing distribution (antitrust, progressive taxation) have been allowed to atrophy. We know that building institutions is a political task and that "politics is the art of the possible." That is a wise conservative counsel. Yet that dictum also prohibits attempting true physical impossibilities in a vain effort to avoid apparent political "impossibilities." When faced with the unhappy dilemma of choosing between a physical or a political impossibility, it is better to attempt the politically "impossible." 

Environmental Justice in America: A New Paradigm by Edwardo Lao Rhodes (Indiana University Press) examines the issue of environmental justice as a public policy concern and recom­mends the use of a new methodology for evalu­ating environmental justice problems. Rather than argue the merits of growth versus environ­mental protection, Edwardo Lao Rhodes makes the case that race and class were not a major con­cern of environmental policy until the 1990s. Why this was so and why awareness of social jus­tice must be an important consideration in thinking about environmental impact take up the first part of the book. Part II looks more closely at public policy concerns and discusses the meth­odological approaches that shed light on the problem of environmental justice. Rhodes pro­poses the application of "data envelopment analysis" as a more useful risk-assessment tool than the current methodologies. Part III examines a complex case involving the disposal of hazard­ous material in rural Noxubee County, Missis­sippi. The acknowledgment that it was difficult to arrive at an "equitable" solution in Noxubee leads to a discussion of recommendations to help ensure that sharing the burden of risk will be­come a fundamental part of environmental policy. Though the book is primarily concerned with justice issues in the United States, it links these issues to international environmental jus­tice programs and to issues of national sover­eignty, to the paternalism of developed nations toward the underdeveloped world, and to notions of economic necessity. 

EDWARDO LAO RHODES is Professor of Public and Environmental Affairs at the Indiana University School of Public and Environmental Affairs.

Summary: In the chapters of Part 1, we explore the key dimensions of the environ­mental-justice issues. Given their early stages of development, a neces­sary exercise is establishing a working set of terms for discussion. After the Chapter 1 introduction of the topic, Chapter 2 provides short exposi­tions and illustrations defining key terms in this debate, such as environ­mental racism, environmental equity, environmental justice, and environmental protection rights. As Chapter 2 explains, much misunderstanding and mis­interpretation of conditions in this area directly result from participants hearing the same terms but assigning them different meanings and sig­nificance. While the definitions provided are neither definitive nor exhaus­tive, they do establish a fixed starting point for subsequent discussion. A very important feature of Chapter z will be specifying a matrix classifica­tion of environmental-justice issues based on whether the issues are geo­graphically and location specific or population and nonlocation specific. Confusion over "environmental-justice remedies," or even how to analyze a particular environmental-justice problem, often springs from failing to ap­preciate the inherent difference between types of environmental-justice issues.

Chapter 3 explores the question, Why were race and other factors of societal stratification left out of the original environmental agenda? Our initial focus in this chapter will be on the early preservation/conservation roots of the modern environmental movement and what those roots mean in terms of modern attitudes and agendas. A case is made that a major rea­son for the modern agendas' neglect can be traced backed to the foundation philosophy and early beginnings of the modern environmental move­ment. It is argued that many of the questioned behavior and policies en­countered in environmental organizations have less to do with some de­liberate racism or social elitism in the movement and more to do with these organizations having evolved from an ethos that was indifferent to the needs of the poor and minorities. Such indifference in part has led to the evolution of organizational agendas that have either no clear concept of social ethics or with social ethics skewed in such a way as to make them appear almost callous.

However, as will become more evident from what follows in this and sev­eral subsequent chapters, no single factor can be identified as the prime culprit. The reasons for the agenda omissions are many and interrelated. To a lesser extent, the chapter also examines the impact of introducing race and similar social dynamics into current environmental policy consid­erations. But make no mistake: the issue is not just one of race. The larger issue examined is the reason for the absence of almost any concern in these agendas about the differentiated social/economic/health effects of both environmental activities and policies.

The chapter explores the idea that in many ways, concerns over social/ economic/health conditions and the ramifications of environmental poli­cies and activities may have been simply beyond the threshold of percep­tion of these organizations. It is not a question of rejection, but rather one of obliviousness to the existence or importance of such social ethics issues in environmental policy. One policy analyst noted a lack of concern and indifference exhibited when exploring with a group of environmental sci­ence and policy students the economic ramifications of a blanket imposi­tion of a certain environmental policy that could have a large negative im­pact on regional employment and economic well-being. As he commented to one of the most vocal students, who felt nothing should stand in the way of such a "sound" environmental policy, "I can see you have never been hungry."

Chapter 4 follows up on the exploration of Chapter 3 with an examina­tion and argument for why the environmental-justice movement has only recently become such a public issue when the conditions of differentiated environmental impacts have existed for so long. It observes that all social and economic policy movements must go through an evolutionary process which for the nascent environmental-justice movement did not coincide with the mainstream environmental movement. This evolution has been described in different ways, but typically, such descriptions begin with an issue-recognition stage, followed by ever-increasing public awareness and debate on the issue, culminating in the formulation of specific legislative agenda items that may or may not be enacted.

The final two chapters in Part 1 consider first the question of minority attitudes toward environmental issues and then the problems of establish­ment agencies' attitudes toward minority or class concerns. Chapter 5 summarizes a series of national surveys conducted over a number of years on minority attitudes toward several dimensions of environmental policy and environmental conditions, and the relative importance of environ­mental protection versus other socioeconomic conditions, such as crime, employment, and education. These surveys reveal a level of minority con­cern about environmental issues not too dissimilar from that of the majority population. These surveys do not support the notion of minority lack of environmental involvement or presence in the decision-making process due to lack of environmental concern. What does emerge is a suggestion that in some cases, while important, environmental issues may, however, occupy a lower position of importance relative to issues such as crime, education, or poverty.

The last chapter in Part 1, Chapter 6, looks at the US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a representative of the general attitude that governmental environmental agencies have exhibited toward the issue of environmental justice. Both in personnel makeup and personnel attitudes, the EPA, in spite of a concerted effort to introduce environmental justice as an issue in their policy process, faces a difficult problem of cultural re­sistance. Even more to the point, the chapter points out that relative to most of the other environmental and natural resource management govern­ment agencies such as the Department of Energy or the Department of the Interior, the EPA has actually come the furthest.

In any lengthy discussion of a major socioeconomic policy issue, such as environmental justice, at some point one has to deal with what govern­ment's role should be. As important as it was to appreciate the dynamics of the evolution and process of environmental justice, it is equally important to carefully consider what role, if any, government can and should take in confronting this issue and the specific form of that role. Not all socioeco­nomic problems require a governmental solution. An important policy­analytic achievement is determining when not to call in the government troops. An essential feature of the question, What ... and how? is at a practical level-examining how to actually assess specific conditions and their possible policy significance. Chapters 7 through 9 attempt to answer this question by exploring the following operational sets of criteria:

  • Reasons for government involvement in environmental justice.

  • Approaches to measuring environmental socioeconomic impact, whether

  • by governmental or nongovernmental organizations.

  • Demonstration of a method for assessing environmental-justice conditions that involve multiple risks.

Chapter 7 begins this exploration: it argues that from the perspective of maximizing overall social welfare, government involvement can be justified only in the presence of very specific socioeconomic conditions. And in the specific case of environmental justice, there are instances where these con­ditions may not occur. Most of these necessary and sufficient conditions revolve around the occurrence of what economists call market failure. Of course, all government intervention does not entail responding to market failure. But it may be argued that in the case of most environmental-justice problems, market failure should be the guiding criterion for any corrective government involvement.' Ignoring this guiding principle, government in­tervention in non-market-failure environmental-justice situations, while perhaps assisting a few, will often result in a worsening of society's overall welfare.'

But recognizing the reasons for government involvement in the abstract and identifying specific occurrences in the real world are two very different exercises. As will become clearer in Chapters 8 and 9, the issues of govern­ment involvement in many environmental-justice cases greatly depend on proper measurements of environmental-justice conditions and occurrences. In fact, a major stumbling block in developing a comprehensive federal en­vironmental-justice policy is the poor condition of available measurement, or lack of understanding of the measurement, of occurrences of environ­mental injustice. Poor or inappropriate measurement in this case can lead to misguided intervention decisions. This problem returns us to the axiom that mere observation of an instance of unequal distribution of environmental burdens and benefits does not automatically qualify an event as a case of environmental injustice.

Taking this a step further, and assuming that the question of the form of intervention is resolved, the challenge becomes how to select the appro­priate level and scope of government involvement. That is, is the govern­ment activity one that should be primarily local or state based, or is it more properly federally based? Or should it be a multilevel endeavor? To add to the complexity of the problem, most area-specific environmental-justice problems are just that: area specific, local in both their source and effect. But does this locality parameter mean that the appropriate level of govern­ment involvement should also be local? What if similar local patterns can be detected over a national or regional area? What about non-area-specific problems such as farm worker pesticide exposure, lead poisoning, or con­taminated fish consumption? Are state or federal actions the proper re­sponse to these problems? What about a purely local system that exhibits locality differences that resemble the prisoner's dilemma? That is, those localities with the more restrictive local rules are placed at a competitive disadvantage with other localities in trying to encourage business location in their community. Will not a local-only solution result, nationally or re­gionally, in a less than optimal outcome?'

Political realities and needs will undoubtedly shape much of the govern­ment environmental-justice agenda. Nevertheless, a more careful assess­ment of the question of government involvement still offers a background or foundation on which the politics of action can be played out. In many cases, it is not a choice of a politically viable but inefficient response versus a politically unpalatable but efficient response. Many policy mistakes in past regulatory actions, especially in the environmental area, have been due less to a concession to political realities and more to simple ignorance of the dynamics of the socioeconomic forces involved. Even politicians occa­sionally like to make sense when given the opportunity.

Role of Public-Policy Analysis: In trying for a more rational approach to understanding, assessing, and responding to the issue of environmental justice, a natural decision is to turn to a problem-framing and decision-making approach such as public­policy analysis. Granted, no real-world policy activity in the environmental area, or most other areas of government intervention, reflects a purely "ra­tional" response to a socioeconomic problem. Embedded in any policy de­cision are such factors as the appeasement of constituency groups, political expediency, and many other objectives in which resources are used inef­ficiently. But while admitting that all choices are not immediately rational, such an admission does not diminish the attraction of evaluating an issue such as environmental justice from a perspective other than pure emotion­alism or political expediency.

An important point to recognize about most environmental-justice is­sues is that they seldom involve purely social policy circumstances.' Whether it is decision-making about site location, the use of pesticides in farming, or protocols for the clean-up of hazardous sites, market-driven forces play the major role in outcomes, regardless of other prejudices or biases. There is no evidence that firms or business enterprises, whatever the biases of their decision-makers, choose, for example, minority communities as the sites for a particular burdensome environmental activity out of some desire to discriminate against minorities. Firms, like people, seldom discriminate unless it is in their best perceived interest. Minority communities often lack political clout, lack risk information, are in a weak economic position, or have other disadvantages that make them, purely from a market-driven perspective, a logical location choice. Thus, policy solutions that focus on changing underlying biases and attitudes while ignoring the market realities that allowed these biases and attitudes to reach fruition seldom succeed. And hence, viewing environmental-justice issues through the lens of public-policy analysis is not just a curious exercise, but a necessary condi­tion for successful government response.

The field of public-policy analysis over the last twenty to twenty-five years has rapidly developed as an interrelated collection of methods, concepts, and constructs for evaluating, understanding, and guiding government intervention into what previously have been essentially private market activities. Borrowing heavily from economics, management science, and to a lesser extent political science, public-policy analysis attempts to pro­vide a guideline for possible government response to socioeconomic prob­lems, and at the same time, it provides a framework for assessment of the subsequently developed public activities. Although far from perfect, the policy-analytic approach definitely offers a more structured and rational basis for what to do and when to do it. To the problems at hand, a policy analysis approach to environmental-justice issues does not guarantee solutions, but it does offer useful insights into where to begin looking for them.

A Case of Environmental Justice The Disposal of Hazardous Material in Noxubee County, Mississippi : As a problem in environmental equity, the case of Noxubee County, Mississippi, is noteworthy for its ordinariness. An underinformed mi­nority population appears to be the potential victim of both environ­mental and economic exploitation by a giant industrial enterprise trying to ensure its own economic well-being. Also playing a role in this drama are institutions as varied as a long-established commu­nity civil rights organization opposing its state chapter, a major midwestern university that made a questionable land decision, a state government anxious to boost regional economic development, a fed­eral government agency anxious to avoid a lose-lose engagement, lo­cal commerce groups opposing economic development, mainstream environmental organizations trying to gain credibility in the environmental-justice area, and finally, student organizations from the same midwestern university newly discovering environmental racism. What develops is that in such a complex scenario, where all out­comes have both a positive and a negative side, labels of "good guy" and "bad guy" prove difficult to assign. The "right position" is a vague place that everyone professes to occupy, but to which no one has an exclusive claim. 

 Development 

Valuing the Environment in Developing Countries: Case Studies edited by David Pearce, Corin Pearce, Charles Palmer (Edward Elgar) brings together well-wrought case-studies of how economics is incorporating the insights of ecology and other environmental sciences into schemes to revalue and create new incentives to preserve and manage natural resources rather than exploit them. This volume should become a widely used supplement text in environmental economics and development strategies studies.

 The science of environmental economics is concerned with an array of issues, but they can be conveniently summarized as: (a) measuring the `state of the environment' in terms of how people feel about their surroundings, (b) assessing the causes of environmental degradation, and (c) designing incentive-based policies for improving the environment. In each case the economic perspective differs markedly from what other disciplines would do if confronted with the same issues. A scientist would measure, say, emissions of air pollutant and their atmospheric concentration. This would be a measure of the `state' of the environment. Causes would most probably be assessed by scientists and most social scientists in terms of `who does what'. Thus a slash-and-burn agriculturist, or a logging company, would be seen as the `cause' of the problem of deforestation. To the economist this identification of the proximate agent is not what is meant by a cause. Real, or fundamental, causes relate to the incentive systems that give rise to deforestation; that is, what drives the logger to behave as he does, and why does the agriculturist do what he does? To the economist, the answers lie in the many, varied and frequently contradictory signals that economic systems and governments relay to the proximate agent. It might be a subsidy that is contingent on clearing forest land, or the sale of a forest concession to log which does not reflect the true costs of logging. From this analysis of causes it also follows that the economic approach tends to identify different policy prescriptions to other disciplines. Traditional policies tended to focus on bans or quotas, limits and standards. The policy was `obey this or face the following consequence', or `command and control'. Today some disci­plines seem content with calling for more participation and 'stakeholder dialogue'. Both are important but neither is a recipe for success unless accompanied by a careful analysis of the true causes of environmental deg­radation. In turn, policy has to address those causes, not the cosmetic issues, or, dare one say, the `politically correct' issues. Policy is therefore likely to be directed towards definitions and arrangements of property rights, prices, removal of price disincentives, information and reform of governance.

Probably the most controversial of the stages in the three-part sequence of the economic approach is the way economists assign importance to the state of the environment. Crudely put, the more people care about an issue the more important it is. The economist's approach to measuring the state of the environment is therefore based on human preferences. Scientific measures of environmental trends are important, but they are the object of what people care about. They do not therefore measure the state of the environment, whereas scientific information coupled with preference meas­urement does measure the state of the environment. A surprising number of scientists are wholly or partly indifferent to what people care about. This indifference often stems from scientific arrogance - the feeling that experts `know better' than the `common man'. But some attitudes stem from a belief that, if humans are to survive and prosper on this earth, we cannot trust human preferences to ensure that survival will occur. Nowhere is that view more strongly expressed than in much of the literature on `sustainable development', a notion of an economic and social development path that tries to ensure a lasting rise in human well-being. The problem is that many advocates of sustainable development confuse 'sustainability' with 'surviv­ability'. The latter is hardly worth the candle if survival entails increasing immiseration. Focus on the notion of human well-being and its sustained increase over time would avoid this confusion and its anti-democratic over­tones. Again, this is why economists (in the main - many of them fall into the same trap) emphasize the role played by human preferences.

If preferences are central, how are they measured? The economist brings to bear on this question the whole panoply of welfare economics and the formal links that it establishes between preferences and willingness to pay for a benefit and willingness to accept compensation for a loss. This is the cornerstone of cost-benefit analysis. It has its faults but, to date, no other evaluation procedure comes close to it in terms of theoretical coherence. The idea of measuring preferences as an input to cost-benefit approaches has been around in economics since Jules Dupuit thought about how to justify the costs of roads and bridges in France in the 1840s. Not surpris­ingly, therefore, there is a vast literature covering the technical issues and case studies in developed economies. The application of cost-benefit approaches in the developing world is far more recent. The major texts emerged in the late 1960s and into the 1970s (Marglin et al., 1972; Little and Mirrlees, 1974; Squire and van der Tak, 1975). But none of these texts dealt with environmental assets, despite the fact that environmental destruction has been extraordinarily rapid in the poorer world. Moreover, that destruc­tive process has had substantial negative effects on human well-being. The neglect of environment in developing country cost-benefit analysis, which is mirrored today in a widespread ignorance of environmental economics among development economists, was therefore serious. It has since been rectified in the environmental economics literature, though not, sadly, in most of the development literature.

One issue that may explain the neglect of environmental economics in development work extends the notion of the irrelevance of preferences to decision making in general. If people in rich countries cannot be trusted with their own futures, how can we trust people who are poor, ill-informed and generally preoccupied with the problems of survival? Oddly, this view is often accompanied by the contrary assumption that poor people must always be consulted about their future, a wholly correct approach but one which seems to stop short of actually measuring their preferences. In the early days of environmental economics in developing countries it was quite common to come across the view that `cultural' differences made the use of economic valuation inappropriate or unworkable in poor countries. The contributions to this volume are testimony to the error of this assumption. They are all concerned, in one way or the other, with the measurement of preferences for environmental change.

The current volume is one of two, the first dealing with the developing world and the second of which will deal with the developed world. Most, but not all, of the contributions come from authors who have at one time or the other worked in the Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE) at University College London, in associ­ation with the University of East Anglia. CSERGE was founded in 1991 on the basis of the 'state-cause-policy' paradigm identified above. By and large, CSERGE's work has been driven by economic analysis. Hence the current volume is focused entirely on economic approaches. The range of applications is very wide, from water quality to air pollution, from wetlands to wildlife tourism. The common theme is that economic valuation based on what people want is perfectly feasible in the developing world. None of the authors pretends that the techniques they adopt are perfect, but they show how they can be applied, often with limited resources, to critical issues in development. A second theme, which is in no way a logical consequence of measuring preferences, is that environmental assets are important - the resulting economic valuations are often large relative to the opportunity cost of surrendering the environmental resource. Third, some of the chapters show that the 'non-market' benefits of the assets in question are espe­cially important for low income groups. It is a common error to find `income' being measured by wages or receipts from the sale of crops, the apparently non-monetized benefits that many poor people get from envi­ronmental resources being ignored. Fourth, but only implicit in most of the chapters, what local people are willing to pay for the conservation of envi­ronmental assets may be a small fraction of global willingness to pay.

People in developed economies are willing to pay a lot to be tourists in wild­life-rich countries, and many will pay simply to conserve the asset in ques­tion without any probability that they will actually see the asset. This non-use value does much to explain donations to charities that specialize in environmental conservation in the developing world.

Why might rich people's valuations be relevant to developing country conservation policy? Because valuation is only one stage of a two-stage process. If we can demonstrate how important the environment is in terms of willingness to pay, then the next stage is to devise ways in which those valuations can be realized as cash flows. The issue is to design `capture' mechanisms. A cost-benefit analysis does not concern itself with capture mechanisms - that is, means of converting non-monetary benefits to cash flows. If benefits exceed costs, that is sufficient cause to recommend conser­vation. But for a great many policy contexts, costs and benefits matter only if they are associated with real resource flows. Capture mechanism design is therefore critical if, say, the black rhinoceros or the Chinese panda is to avoid extinction.

One other theme is relevant. A great deal of interest has been shown in recent years in the idea of extending national income accounts to reflect envi­ronmental asset change. Forests can be depleted and GNP might actually rise. But the rise masks a reduction in the underlying stock of economic assets since the forest stock is a constituent part of those assets. It is therefore impor­tant to set the record straight and include the depletion of the forest as a loss of real wealth. Amending income accounts in this way seems worthwhile, but its usefulness should not be exaggerated. Far too many politicians have not understood what modifying the national accounts means, and far too many believe that, once they have been modified in some way, economic decisions will change. There is no real evidence to support this view.

Economic valuation thus has many uses. It can be used to modify national income accounts; it can be used as an essential ingredient of cost-benefit analysis; often overlooked, it can be used to signal that an issue is important in economic terms, an argument that is sometimes powerful when the person to be persuaded is the minister for finance. In the rich world it can be used to measure damage liability and to set environmental taxes, both uses also being relevant to the developing world as the transition to higher incomes comes about and environmental institutions grow. 

Ethics 

Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics by Robert Phillips, R. Edward Freeman (Berrett-Koehler) Business ethics has never been more prominent than today and stakeholder theory is, unquestionably, the most popular framework for discussing business ethics. However, there remains a relative shortage of in-depth treatments of the topic, and these tend to be "how-to" manuals rather than academic works. In short, there is a dearth of books on the market that provide a detailed defense of the actual "theory" behind stakeholder theory. Remarkably, the only similar book in existence, R. Edward Freeman’s classic, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach has been out of print for a decade. Author Robert Phillips was doctoral student of Freeman’s at the University of Virginia’s Darden School, so Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics is not only a natural outgrowth of this earlier work but is also long overdue for publication.

  • Business ethics, including corporate responsibility, has become a very hot area in the popular as well as the academic literature
  • Stakeholder theory is a prominent popular and academic way of understanding business ethics, however no full-scale defense of stakeholder theory exists
  • Examines stakeholder theory from the perspective of several fields of study including strategic management, economics, moral and political philosophy, social psychology, and environmental ethics

A look at recent headlines proves that business ethics has never been more prominent than it is today. As scandal after scandal emerges in the American business world, we are forced to ask: Is there no ethics in business? Haven't the last 25 years of teaching and research in business ethics by philosophers and management thinkers made a difference? For whose benefit should a business organization be managed?

Author Robert Phillips cuts through many vexing questions to propose a theory of organizational ethics that takes two important ideas seriously. The first is that organizations are dependent on their stakeholders for their successes and their failures. The second idea is the multifaceted theory of ethics from philosopher John Rawls-the most prominent moral and political philosopher of the twentieth century-and his followers. The heart of Rawls's view is his theory of justice articulated in the principle of equal liberty.

Stakeholder theory is unquestionably the most popular framework for discussing business ethics. With the exception of R. Edward Freeman's classic, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, which has been out of print for a decade, there is a dearth of books that provide a detailed defense of the actual "theory" behind stakeholder theory. Thus, Phillips' Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics is not only a natural outgrowth of this earlier work, but also one that is long overdue for publication.

Addressing the difficult question of what the moral underpinning of stakeholder theory should be, Phillips elaborates a "principle of stakeholder fairness" based on Rawls's ideas. Phillips shows how this fairness principle clarifies several long-standing questions in stakeholder theory, including: Who are an organization's legitimate stakeholders? What is the basis for this legitimacy? What, if any, are the limits of stakeholder theory? What is the relationship between stakeholder theory and other moral, political, and business ethical theories? Applying research from many related disciplines, Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics is an overdue response to several long­standing and fundamental points of contention within business ethics and management theory.

Robert Phillips received his PhD. from the University of Virginia's Darden School where he studied with premier business ethicists R. Edward Freeman and Patricia Werhane. He has held faculty positions at Georgetown and the Wharton School prior to coming to the University of San Diego where he now holds a joint appointment in the Management and Social/Legal areas of the School of Business as an Assistant Professor.
The dissertation upon which the book is based was a finalist for Best Dissertation at the Academy of Management Social Issues in Management division and the material that forms the foundation of Chapter Two in the book was co-winner of the Best Paper award at the Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting in 1997. 

Mathematics 

The Elements of Statistics with Applications to Economics and the Social Sciences by H. Joseph Newton, Jane Harvill, James Bernard Ramsey (Duxbury) Designed for instructors who want to stress the understanding of basic concepts and the development of "statistical intuition," this book demonstrates that statistical reasoning is everywhere and that statistical concepts are as important to students' personal lives as they are to their future professional careers. Ramsey aims to develop statistically literacy - from the ability to read and think critically about statistics published in popular media to the ability to analyze and act upon statistics gathered in the business world. Each chapter contains a large set of exercises and the text comes with a simplified student version of S-Plus. Most of the computational work required for these exercises can be carried out through a menu-driven GUI interface. To help facilitate learning, many worked examples are also provided. The mathematical requirements include a little beyond what a student should have upon entry into a first calculus course in an American university, i.e., little beyond basic algebra. An appendix explains all the mathematics used in the text. The underlying philosophy of this book is that given a reasonable level of depth in the analysis, the student can later acquire a much more extensive, and even more intensive, exposure to statistics on their own or in the context of the work environment. Some use of calculus is included. Use of the computer is integrated throughout.

The Elements of Statistics with Applications to Economics and the Social Sciences is an innovative and excellent undergraduate level text on the foundations and reasoning of statistics estimation and inference. This book is written for the curious student who is interested in understanding the basics of statistical analysis, the intuition behind statistical and information processing, and the process of decision making based on some data. Most importantly, in this book Ramsey takes the student through a fascinating voyage of discovery. In this voyage, Ramsey devotes significant effort to explaining what are the fundamental rules underlying most data analyses within the social and natural sciences. This is done without requiring much prior knowledge of calculus and with almost no formal mathematics. Ramsey accomplishes this task by building on a large number of real world examples, some of which he re-evaluates at the end of each chapter. By doing so, he allows the reader (student or researcher) to see the real value of the knowledge just acquired in the most recent chapter. That is, "what can I understand now about that specific problem that I could not understand before." In that way the student is going through an on-going learning process. A process that allows one to understand the data by recognizing what is observed and what is not observed, what is random and what is not random, what process may have generated the data, and what one can infer from the data.
To summarize, once Ramsey expresses his philosophy of approaching statistical analyses, he proceeds to teach statistics in a completely new and innovative way. First, unlike existing undergraduate textbooks, Ramsey teaches the students via a "discovery" approach where each step starts with a new set of questions and the students are guided toward discovering the relevant answer, given the information they have. Second, the text is easy to read and is full with real world examples taken from a large number of disciplines. Finally, the book is equipped with complete software (S-Plus) that provides the necessary tool for the students to practice and understand how to work with real data. This is an ideal undergraduate level textbook. It is a very useful statistical text for the open minded and advanced undergraduate student and provides the teacher with a perfect teaching tool.

Contents: 1. STATISTICS AS SCIENCE. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. Statistics: A Framework for Decision Making. Statistics and the Methodology of Science. Statistics as Science Itself. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Addendum for the Reader. Exercises. 2. TYPES OF VARIABLES, MEASUREMENTS, AND EXPLANATION. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. Types of Variables. Random and Deterministic Variables. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 3. HOW TO DESCRIBE AND SUMMARIZE RANDOM DATA BY GRAPHICAL PROCEDURES. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. Describing Data by Box and Whisker Plots. Plotting Relative Frequencies. Cumulative Frequencies. Histogram. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 4. MOMENTS AND THE SHAPE OF HISTOGRAMS. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. The Mean, a Measure of Location. The Second Moment as a Measure of Spread. General Definition of Moments. Standardized Moments. Standardization of Variables. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 5. THE DESCRIPTION OF BIVARIATE DATA. What You Will Learn From this Chapter. Introduction. Three Dimensional Histograms. Scatter Plots. Standardization for Pairs of Random Variables. Covariation and m11, the first Cross Product Moment. Linear Statistical Relationships and the Correlation Coefficient. The Correlation Coefficient and "Slope". Rank Correlation. Bivariate Categorical Data. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 6. THE THEORY OF STATISTICS: AN INTRODUCTION. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. The Theory: First Steps. Conditional Probability. Random Variables: Intuition Made Formal. Statistical Independence. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 7. THE GENERATION AND DESCRIPTION OF DISCRETE PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION. What You Will Learn in This Chapter. Introduction. Combinations and Permutation. Generating Binomial Probabilities. Expectation. The Cumulative Distribution Function. Summary. Case Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 8. THE GENERATION OF SOME CONTINUOUS PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. How to Express Probability in Terms of Continuous Random Variables. Theoretical Moments and Density Functions. The Uniform Distribution. The Normal, or Gaussian, Density Function and the Central Limit Theorem. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 9. ELEMENTARY SAMPLING THEORY. What You Will Learn in This Chapter. Introduction. An Illustrative Example. An Introduction to the Theory of Simple Random Sampling. Stratified Random Sampling. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 10. ESTIMATION OF THEORETICAL MOMENTS AND THE PARAMETES OF PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. The Estimation of Theoretical Moments: Large Sample Results. The Estimation of Moments and Parameters: Confidence Intervals and Small Sample Results. Maximum Likelihood Estimators. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 11. HYPOTHESIS TESTING: OR HOW TO DISCRIMINATE BETWEEN TWO ALTERNATIVES. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. The Basic Idea of Hypothesis Tests. Simple and Composite Hypothesis Test. Two Sided Hypothesis Tests. Test of Proportions. Hypothesis Tests when the Variance is Unknown. Some Practical Examples. Summary. Case Study: What There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 12. THE GENERATION OF BIVARIATE AND CONDITIONAL PROBABILTY DISTRIBUTIONS. What You Will Learn in This Chapter. Introduction. Some Pragmatic Examples. The Generation of Bivariate Discrete Distribution. The Generation of Bivariate Continuous Distribution. Bivariate and Conditional Distributions Obtained by Sampling. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Exercises. 13. THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF REGRESSSION ANALYSIS. What You Will Learn in this chapter. Introduction. The Regression Model. Estimation and Inference: The Basics. Estimation and Inference: Confidence Intervals and Hypothesis Tests. The Regression in Regression Analysis. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 12. COMPARING POPULATIONS THROUGH THE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. An Introduction to One Way Analysis of Variance. Summary. Case Study: Was There Age Discrimination in a Public Utility. Figures. Exercises. 15. RETROSPECTIVE. What You Will Learn in this Chapter. Introduction. A Schematic Review of What You Have Learned. The Role of Statistics in Everyday Life. Case Study: Was There Discrimination in a Public Utility. The Relationship between Sciences and Statistics. What You Might Learn Next in Statistics. Exercises. A. MATHEMATICAL APPENDIX: REVIEW OF CONCEPTS AND CONVENTIONS. Notational Conventions. Indexing. Sigma Notation. Elementary Set Theory. Elements of Calculus. Exercises. B. DIRECTIONS FOR USING THE STUDENT VERSION OF S-PLUS 4.5 IN THIS TEXT. C. DIRECTIONS FOR USING MICROSOFT EXCEL IN THIS TEXT.

Theory

Reconstructing Economic Theory: The Problem of Human Agency y Allen Oakley (Edward Elgar) This book applies a critical focus on the extent to which methodological practices in mainstream economic theory impede our understanding of substantive economic phenomena as the products of human action. Economists, in general, work with a concept and representation of the human agent that is palpably unrealistic. Most do so, not out of ignorance, but rather to maintain the pretence that economics is the only true science among the social sciences because it enforces the use of rigorous and formalist methods of argument.

Allen Oakley's inquiry pursues ideas of social ontology pertinent to reconstructing economic theory in a way that addresses this lack of realism. These ideas take the form of a revised metatheory for a humanistic economics in which priority is given to properly understanding and depicting the human origins of economic phenomena, rather than to meeting the imposed demands of scientistic rigour. Indeed, he demonstrates that many ontological ideas pertinent to such a reconstruction are extant in the literature of social philosophy and theory, a literature largely neglected by economic theorists.

Economists and social scientists concerned about the nature and problems of mainstream economic theory will gain a great deal from reading this challenging book.

The implicit critical focus of this book is the limited extent to which current methodological practices in economics enable us to understand substantive economic phenomena as products of human agency. Economists in general, especially those considered to be doing orthodox things, work with a concept and representation of the human agent that is palpably unrealistic. Most do so not out of ignorance, for if pressed, they would all admit this to be the case. They do so, rather, because it is convention and accepted practice. Indeed, to do otherwise, risks professional suicide and peer derision as a `pop sociologist'. The deeper reason for it, though, is the pretence of mainstream economists that economics is the real science among the social sciences. It has this status because of its use of rigorous and formalist methods of argument. This is a sacred belief and is defended with religious zeal.

My contribution here is not another critique of mainstream economic theory as such. There are already extant a number of penetrating critical deconstructions of the contemporary discipline. These have established repeatedly that, from a number of different perspectives, the accepted mode of constructing economic theory is fundamentally flawed. My concern is, rather, that captured in the title of the book: the inquiry pursues ideas pertinent to reconstructing economic theory. And, to keep the project within manageable bounds, the endeavour is confined to the pre-substantive level. This restriction limits my inquiry to reconstructing the foundations so that they can carry a new edifice. These foundations will be in the form of a revised metatheory that provides the essential premises required by a more completely humanistic economics. The underpinning belief will be that any attempt so to reconstruct economic theory must give priority to understanding properly the human origins of its object phenomena, and that this understanding should precede and dominate the design of its methodology.

There is already a consciousness among some mainstream economists that there exist problems with their theories that are attributable to the treatment of the human agent as purely homo oeconomicus. In the extant efforts to make mainstream economic theory `more realistic', the most common feature is some extension and revision of the way the human agent is represented. These extensions include amendments to what it means for agents to be `rational', more attention to the demand for information in decision-making, more explicit representations of the interdependence and interactions between

agents, and a greater recognition of the social and institutional context of, and influences on, economic actions. But what remains unchallenged for most of these economists is the deductive-nomological method that dictates the form of their analyses. The effect has been that the genuine intention to be `more realistic' has been truncated by the seemingly irrevocable precondition that it not impede the established norms of formalism and logical rigour that define what is acceptable in the construction of economic theory.

By contrast, I will argue that in treating economics as incorrigably a human and social science, the primary concern should be with the implications for economic theory construction of adopting a `realistic' representation of the human agent and of human action. Among philosophers of the social sciences, this is no novel suggestion. Such visions of agents and actions are already extant in philosophical anthropology and social theory. It is a well-established thesis in anthropological and social inquiry that the actions of human beings qua agents are the joint product of their congenital and acquired characteristics, in combination with the multifarious influences of those situational structures and social relationships that they accept and treat as relevant to their well-being. These are the key tenets of the metatheory called situational analysis.

The strategy of my inquiry will be to explore a selected range of past and contemporary ideas concerning the nature and role of human agency in understanding and accounting for the phenomena of the human realm generally, and that part of it that relates to economics in particular. It will become apparent that although there exists an extensive modern literature on the themes pertinent to situational analysis to be addressed in this study, there remain a number of underappreciated and underutilized contributions to the matters at hand by social philosophers and theorists of the recent past. Each of the writers chosen for inclusion here will be shown to have made some contribution to building up a metatheory for the social sciences that has immediate relevance to a reconstruction of economic theory.

The fundamental idea upon which this study is based is a deceptively obvious and simple one. It is that, undeniably, all the observed events and data we refer to as economic originate in, and are generated by, human decisions and actions. That is, the phenomena with which economists deal, be they of private or government origin, are the results of individual and/or collective human agency. The consequent belief underpinning arguments here is that claims to know about and fully to understand, and thus to be able to explain and perhaps make predictions about, economic phenomena must be grounded in arguments that are, in principle at least, reducible to arguments that refer to human action. It must be granted, of course, that the individual human agent is not the only entity in the human realm that is able to act, to be an agent in the sense of making a difference. Nevertheless, all acting entities of concern to the social sciences are manifestations of some complex of individual human actions. What needs to be recognized in the `reduction' to such human action is the fact that often the actions of complex entities cannot be reduced to any mere summation of what individuals contributed to it. Actions within the structures of such entities involve such a complex of interactions, both formal and informal, that fully accounting for and discursively representing the elements of the entity's action would simply be beyond our analytical capacities. That is, such entities have `a life of their own' that is a product of, but never fully reducible to, the actions of its constituent individuals. It remains the case, though, that any account of an observed phenomenon that stops short of some endeavour to trace its human origins cannot but be incomplete.

The intention of my study, then, can be seen to be confined to making a fundamental contribution to what is, implicitly, the need for a much more far­reaching methodological and substantive reconstruction. To this end, while the inclusion of an extended vision of human agency into the theory of economic phenomena will be necessary to such a reconstruction, it cannot be sufficient to ensure the development of the full range of revisions required to deliver a proper understanding and representation of these phenomena. The developments undertaken here leave the matters of understanding and discursively representing the human agent and human agency in particular substantive cases largely unattended. Much pertaining to methodology and substance remains to be done. 

Textbooks

Economics 3rd Edition by Joseph E. Stiglitz, Carl E. Walsh (W.W. Norton) The science of economics has made great strides in the past 25 years. We now understand such problems as the role of information in the efficiency of economic outcomes, the importance of strategy in the outcome of economic relationships, the significance of finance in our understanding of the firm, and, most importantly, the ways in which microeconomic phenomena relate to those of macroeconomics. With this fresh and original textbook, an economics professor at Stanford University brings new economics to an introductory course. Color photographs and diagrams.

Author Introduction: The Third Edition of this textbook has a number of significant changes. To begin with, it is now a collaborative effort. By working together, we have been able to broaden dramatically the range of experience and expertise that informs our book. The result is a new edition that improves substantially over its predecessors while still retaining their guiding principles.

As we worked on the revision we kept our sites on four main objectives. The first was to ensure that the book continues to provide students with a clear presentation of the basic competitive model, while also ensuring that students can quickly move on to explore the richness of modern economic analysis in areas such as the economics of information, imperfect competition, and the economics of technology and innovation. These areas, prominent in the previous editions, have taken on an even greater relevance as information technologies change the marketplace. Our second objective was to present macroeconomics in a manner that builds on the way economic researchers and economists in policymaking positions frame their analysis, while doing so in a manner that prepares students for understanding the public debates on monetary and fiscal policy. Our third objective was to present modern economics in a way that is conducive to good teaching and student learning. Here, we stress core concepts and have reorganized the book so that instructors will find it flexible enough for a variety of classroom and lecture settings. Whether it is used for a one‑semester course covering the principles of microcconormcs and macroeconomics or for a one‑quarter course devoted solely to either micro or macro, the new edition allows instructors to combine core chapters with a selection of additional chapters that contain extensive depth coverage of various topics, or that focus on issues of current policy debate.

Much has changed in the modern economy and in modern economics since the Second Edition of this text book. The productivity slowdown that gripped the economy in the twenty years after 1973 was replaced in the last half of the 1990s by an apparent productivity acceleration. The fiscal deficits of the 1990s were replaced, as the century ended, with fiscal surplus, although the economic slowdown and the War on Terrorism have quickly eroded these surpluses. The long economic expansion of the 1990s came to an end when the book was in the last stages of preparation. New technologies, particularly those associated with information‑based systems, are transforming the economy to such a degree that many observers have come to describe the contemporary economic environment as a new economy. Our fourth objective was to write a textbook that reflects the contemporary scene. Thus, the Third Edition integrates the recent developments associated with innovation and the digital economy by using examples from the new economy.

Principles of Microeconomics: As we began work on this edition, we were repeatedly reminded of the importance of writing a textbook that reflects modern microeconomics‑one that recognizes the importance of incentives, limited information, innovation, and technology. The new economy has provided many new examples and case studies to illustrate the core principles of economics. And the new economy provides further evidence of the importance of information and technology, topics whose treatment has always been one of the strengths of the previous editions. The new economy, despite its current slump, has forcefully driven home the critical role new technologies play in the modern economy. For students to make sense of competition policy in the twenty‑first century, they need to understand what network externalities are and how information and ideas are different from traditional goods and services.

In the presentation of microeconomics, previous editions of this book have been distinguished by their emphasis on information, imperfect markets, innovation, and technology. This distinction continues to mark the Third Edition.

Key changes for the Third Edition:

A number of key changes have been made to the structure of the microeconomics sections. These include:

  • The opening chapter (Chapter 1) uses the story of the Internet to introduce basic concepts in economics. Five core concepts (incentives, trade‑offs, exchange, information, and distribution) are explained in this opening chapter and then woven throughout the book in Thinking Like an Economist boxes that serve to illustrate how these key concepts help students understand issues from overloaded AOL modem servers (Chapter 1) to why developing economies have supported trade liberalization for information technologies but not for financial services (Chapter 18).

  • The organization has been streamlined to allow the core material for the basic competitive model to be covered in the first ten chapters. This is followed in Part 3 by six chapters covering imperfect markets, information, and the role of the government.

  • A new introductory chapter to Part 3 (Chapter 11) provides an overview of imperfect competition in the goods market, imperfect information, and imperfections in the labor market. This is followed by individual chapters that deal with each topic in greater depth. This allows instructors to introduce students to all these important topics even in shorter courses or when both microeconomics and macroeconomics need to be covered within a single course.

  • Optional chapters have been collected together in Part 4. Teachers who wish to go beyond the basic course comprised in Chapters 1 through 16 may add in chapters from Part 4 as they see fit. For instance, after covering the labor and capital markets in Chapter 9, some teachers may wish to cover investment decisions, discussed in Chapter 17, "A Student's Guide to Investing:' Similarly, the other chapters of Part 4 can be used to satisfy particular course objectives according to the teacher's needs. The flow chart below shows the chapter dependencies for the book.

  • Strategic behavior permeates modern economic analy sis, so we have added a new chapter (Chapter 19) that uses simple examples to introduce students to the concepts of Nash equilibrium, dominant strategies, backward induction, and sequential and repeated games.

Principles of Macroeconomics: The year 2001 saw an unprecedented period of sustained economic growth coming to an end, reinforcing the need to provide students with a macroeconomic framework that encompasses both growth and fluctuations. The model of fluctuations in the Third Edition is ideal for helping students understand the Fed's interest rate cuts during 2001, as well as the impact of fiscal policies designed to cut taxes and increase expenditures.

The basic organization of macroeconomics remains from the second edition, with the full‑employment model with flexible wages and prices developed first, followed by a treatment of economic fluctuations. Each part has seen major restructuring, however.

Key changes for the Third Edition:

  • The macroeconomic presentation kicks off with a new introductory chapter that deals with the major issues in macroeconomics.
  • The material on the full‑employment model now places greater stress on the role of the capital market and the real rate of interest in ensuring aggregate demand and supply balance at full‑employment output.
  • The pickup in economic growth at the end of the 1990s and the debate over the role of new technologies have meant that issues of growth and productivity have reemerged as ones of critical importance. Because the fullemployment model of Part 6 provides the basis for understanding the economics of growth and productivity, we now devote a complete chapter to these issues at an early stage in the macro presentation.
  • Because major central banks around the world no longer implement monetary policy through explicit control of the money supply, the traditional discussion of money demand and supply has been de‑emphasized. Instead, monetary policy is discussed in terms of nominal interest‑rate control. The book focuses on the federal funds market so that students can gain an understanding of what the Federal Reserve actually does when it intervenes to raise or lower the rate.
  • Over the last decade, both academic researchers and  economists in central bank research departments world wide have increasingly made use of a basic foundation for macroeconomic policy analysis that relies on three components. First, underlying wage and price rigidities lead inflation to adjust in response to movements of out­put around its full‑employment level and to expectations of inflation. Second, aggregate demand depends on the real interest rate and expectations of future income. And third, monetary policy is represented by either a rule for setting the nominal rate of interest or by the specification of the central bank's objectives, such as is typified by an inflation‑targeting policy regime. The model of eco­nomic fluctuations we use reflects this framework.
  • The model of fluctuations is developed in terms of in­flation and output, and it integrates monetary policy based on the federal funds rate. Thus, rather than de­velop an aggregate demand and supply model based on the price level and then append a model of price level adjustment to explain inflation, the entire discussion is carried out in terms of inflation and output. This pro­vides a more integrated framework and is ideal for get­ting students to understand monetary policy actions. It is also ideal for analyzing both the inflation‑targeting policies adopted by major central banks such as the Bank of England and the Bank of Canada and the ac­tions of other central banks such as the Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank.

In revising the macroeconomics presentation, the authors have continued to honor one of the central objectives that moti­vated the earlier editions: to write a modern textbook that reflects, as much as possible, the way economists approach their subject. The treatment of macroeconomics in the new edition does this while also presenting a model that students can apply directly to the policy debates they read about in newspapers or hear reported on the television.

Titles in Brief

Introduction to Economic Growth by Charles I. Jones (Second Edition: W.W. Norton) One of the hottest fields in contemporary macroeconomics, economic growth is both fascinating to theorists and critically important to policy makers. In Introduction to Economic Growth—the only text in the field designed specifically for advanced undergraduates—Charles I. Jones explains in clear, direct language how economists have come to understand the long-run growth of economies. Beginning with empirical evidence—how rich are the rich countries, how poor are the poor, and how fast do the rich and poor countries grow? —Professor Jones then presents the major theories of economic growth, from the Nobel Prize-winning work of Robert Solow to the new growth theory that has ignited the field in recent years. 

Inclusive Economics: Gandhian Method and Contemporary Policy by Narendar Pani (Sage) Economics today is dominated by pragmatism. And what is considered pragamatic can change all the time. George Bush may have been elected on a platform of smaller government, but that has not stopped him from launching a major expenditure thrust that has converted a stable surplus budget into a major deficit one. If this change is good for America and the world, fine. But how can we be sure that he is not just doing what is expedient?

It is in such situations that a revival of Gandhian method could be useful. Pani manages to bring out a method from Gandhi's writings that can help ensure that pragmatism does not degenerate into expediency. He builds a consistent inclusive method and places it in the context of recent debates on economic methodology. As such an exercise has not been tried out before, some of its elements will surprise Gandhians. And some of the implicit recommendations, like the need to focus on the individual rather than national economies, will surprise mainstream economists. But at a time when ideology has failed, a scientific return to Gandhi does appear promising.

Beyond the Asian Crisis: Pathways to Sustainable Growth edited by Anis Chowdhury, Iyanatul Islam (Edward Elgar) As Southeast and Northeast Asia recover from the Asian crisis and return to a state of growth, the authors of this book assess the lessons to be learned from the crisis to achieve sustainable development in the future. While the importance of each factor contributing to the crisis varies from country to country, their collective experience has created unprecedented turmoil in current thinking on development policy.

The authors argue that the major schools of thought need paradigm changes in the wake of the crisis. Those who believe that a ‘strong state’ or system of semi-democracy is essential for economic growth have been disproved by the sudden collapse of these economies. These countries must now adapt to the fact that society must be open to ideas and democratize its polity to achieve innovation-driven sustainable development. Those who used the success of East Asian economies as a vindication of the neo-classical orthodoxy, referred to as the ‘Washington consensus’, must now see the follies of progressive withdrawal of the government from the economic sphere and of unfettered flows of short-term capital.

This book offers a timely and reflective analysis of the Asian financial crisis and brings together a detailed overview of the different and often competing responses within the countries of the region. It will be welcomed by students and scholars with an interest in Asian economics, development studies, international political economy, and international relations.

 
 

This site was last updated 06/26/09

Headline 3

insert content here